The Impact of Innovation on Advancing Sustainable Practices in the Industrial Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/scine21.03.110Keywords:
sustainability, innovation, raw material, waste, manufacturingAbstract
Introduction. Sustainable development within the industrial sector has garnered attention due to environmental, social, and economic concerns arising from the irresponsible use of resources. Manufacturing companies have faced the challenge of reducing or optimizing resource use in production processes.
Problem Statement. The paradox in Colombian manufacturing companies has been their declaration of concern for environmental, economic, and social responsibilities while simultaneously demonstrating policies that increase resource use and environmental degradation.
Purpose. This study has aimed to understand how disruptive and incremental innovation in products, production methods, and organizational methods influence the efficient use of resources and waste management in the Colombian industrial sector.
Materials and Methods. Data from two surveys covering 8,264 manufacturing companies across 56 subsectors have been analyzed using advanced statistical techniques. Innovation capabilities have been assessed in terms of product, process, and organizational methods, alongside their environmental impact.
Results. Findings have revealed that innovation in production methods significantly enhances the efficient use of raw materials, while both incremental and disruptive innovations have positively affected waste management practices. However, a need for more investment in research and sustainable practices has been identified, especially in complex sectors like pharmaceuticals and plastics.
Conclusions. The Colombian manufacturing industry has made commendable efforts in innovation and capability building, leading to better environmental performance and reduced raw material usage. The study concludes that despite waste management and resource utilization challenges, a commitment to a circular economy and greener processes presents a viable path forward for the industry.
Downloads
References
Lozano, F. J., Lozano, R. (2018). Assessing the potential sustainability benefits of agricultural residues: Biomass con version to syngas for energy generation or to chemicals production. Journal of cleaner production, 172, 4162—4169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.037
Ajemigbitse, M. A., Cannon, F. S., Klima, M. S., Furness, J. C., Wunz, C., Warner, N. R. (2019). Raw material recovery from hydraulic fracturing residual solid waste with implications for sustainability and radioactive waste disposal. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 21(2), 308—323. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EM00248G
Qi, X., Fu, Y., Wang, R. Y., Ng, C. N., Dang, H., He, Y. (2018). Improving the sustainability of agricultural land use: An integrated framework for the conflict between food security and environmental deterioration. Applied Geography, 90, 214—223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.12.009
Munda, S., Shivakumar, B. G., Rana, D. S., Gangaiah, B., Manjaiah, K. M., Dass, A., ..., Lakshman, K. (2018). Inorganic phosphorus along with biofertilizers improves profitability and sustainability in soybean (Glycine max) — potato (Solanum tuberosum) cropping system. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 17(2), 107—113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2016.01.008
Gupta, N., Poddar, K., Sarkar, D., Kumari, N., Padhan, B., Sarkar, A. (2019). Fruit waste management by pigment production and utilization of residual as bioadsorbent. Journal of environmental management, 244, 138—143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.055
Manual, O. (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting an Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, 30(162), 385—395. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en
Jochamowitz Yriberry, M., Jochamowitz Yriberry, S., Larios Francia, R. P. (2023). The Role of Ecodesign in Circular Economy to Improve the Performance of Enterprises in the Fashion Industry: A Systematic Review of Literature. The International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 19(2), 43—74. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1077/CGP/v19i02/43-74
Asadi, S., Pourhashemi, S. O., Nilashi, M., Abdullah, R., Samad, S., Yadegaridehkordi, E., ..., Razali, N. S. (2020). Investigating influence of green innovation on sustainability performance: A case on Malaysian hotel industry. Journal of cleaner production, 258, 120860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120860
Marino, A., Pariso, P. (2022). Africa’s view of the circular economy: Bottlenecks and opportunities. The International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 19(2), 1. The International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 19(2), 1—16. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1077/CGP/v19i02/1-16
Mousavi, S., Bossink, B., van Vliet, M. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and organizational routines for managing innovation towards sustainability. Journal of cleaner production, 203, 224—239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.215
Masocha, R. (2018). Sustainable marketing practices and sustainable consumer behaviour of tertiary students in South Africa. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 10(3), 248—257. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v10i3.2331
Tseng, C. H., Chang, K. H., Chen, H. W. (2019). Strategic Orientation, Environmental Innovation Capability, and Environmental Sustainability Performance: The Case of Taiwanese Suppliers. Sustainability, 11(4), 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041127
Fernando, Y., Jabbour, C. J. C., Wah, W. X. (2019). Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter? Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 141, 8—20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.031
Behnam, S., Cagliano, R. (2017). Be sustainable to be innovative: An analysis of their mutual reinforcement. Sustainability, 9(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010017
Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability‐oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490—506. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1932
Mengova, E., Green, D. (2023). The Role of Innovation and Technology in Renewable Energy. The International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 19(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1077/CGP/v19i02/17-41
Sameer, H., Bringezu, S. (2019). Life cycle input indicators of material resource use for enhancing sustainability assessment schemes of buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, 230—242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.010
Franco, J. C., Hussain, D., McColl, R. (2019). Luxury fashion and sustainability: looking good together. Journal of Business Strategy, 41, 55—61. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-05-2019-0089
D’Amato, D., Veijonaho, S., Toppinen, A. (2018). Towards sustainability? Forest-based circular bioeconomy business models in Finnish SMEs. Forest Policy and Economics, 101848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.12.004
Vikas, I., Sdrali, D., Abeliotis, K., Apostolopoulos, C. (2022). Environmental Performance Influencing Factors in Industrial Clusters. The International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 18(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1077/CGP/v18i01/59-68
Lenzo, P., Traverso, M., Mondello, G., Salomone, R., Ioppolo, G. (2018). Sustainability performance of an Italian textile product. Economies, 6(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6010017
Sicoli, G., Bronzetti, G., Baldini, M. (2019). The Importance of Sustainability in the Fashion Sector: ADIDAS Case Study. International Business Research, 12(6), 41—51. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v12n6p41
Salerno, M. S., de Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., Da Silva, D. O., Bagno, R. B., Freitas, S. L. T. U. (2015). Innovation processes: Which process for which project? Technovation, 35, 59—70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.012
Matt, D. T., Rauch, E., Dallasega, P. (2015). Trends towards distributed manufacturing systems and modern forms for their design. Procedia cirp, 33, 185—190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.06.034
Damanpour, F., Aravind, D. (2012). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes and antecedents. Management and organization review, 8(2), 423—454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x
Camisón, C., Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of business research, 67(1), 2891—2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
Mas-Verdu, F., Ortiz-Miranda, D., García-Álvarez-Coque, J. M. (2016). Examining organizational innovations in different regional settings. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5324—5329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.132
Azar, G., Ciabuschi, F. (2017). Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness. International business review, 26(2), 324—336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.002
Cho, H., Lee, P., Shin, C. H. (2019). Becoming a sustainable organization: focusing on process, administrative innovation and human resource practices. Sustainability, 11(13), 3554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133554
Katinas, V., Marčiukaitis, M., Perednis, E., Dzenajavičienė, E. F. (2019). Analysis of biodegradable waste use for energy generation in Lithuania. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101, 559—567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.022
Sirohi, R., Singh, A., Malik, S. (2018). Production, Characterization and Industrial Applications of Cellulase Derived from Agro-waste. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 1—9. https://doi.org/10.9734/CJAST/2018/41302
Posmyk, M., Wzorek, M. (2018). Assessing the possible use of selected types of rural waste in biogas production. Intercathedra, 36(3), 283—289. https://doi.org/10.17306/J.INTERCATHEDRA.2018.00034
Sayadi-Gmada, S., Rodríguez-Pleguezuelo, C. R., Rojas-Serrano, F., Parra-López, C., Parra-Gómez, S., García-García, M. D. C., García-Collado, R, Lorbach-Kelle, M. B., Manrique-Gordillo, T. (2019). Inorganic Waste Management in Green house Agriculture in Almeria (SE Spain): Towards a Circular System in Intensive Horticultural Production. Sustainability, 11(14), 3782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143782
Cai, W., Lai, K. H., Liu, C., Wei, F., Ma, M., Jia, S., ..., Lv, L. (2019). Promoting sustainability of manufacturing industry through the lean energy-saving and emission-reduction strategy. Science of The Total Environment, 665, 23—32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.069
de Vargas Mores, G., Finocchio, C. P. S., Barichello, R., Pedrozo, E. A. (2018). Sustainability and innovation in the Brazi lian supply chain of green plastic. Journal of cleaner production, 177, 12—18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.138
Kairytė, A., Vaitkus, S., Vėjelis, S., Pundienė, I. (2018). A Study of Rapeseed Oil-Based Polyol Substitution with Biobased Products to Obtain Dimensionally and Structurally Stable Rigid Polyurethane Foam. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 26(9), 3834—3847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-018-1266-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Copyright Notice Authors published in the journal “Science and Innovation” agree to the following conditions: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of their work (article) published in the journal “Science and Innovation” (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish in their book), while confirming its initial publication in the journal “Science and innovation.” Authors are allowed to place their work on the Internet (for example, in institutional repositories or on their website).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
