“Green” Technologies as an Indicator of Sustainability, Sustainable Development, and Growth in the Innovation Potential of SMEs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/scine21.04.107Keywords:
new technologies, technologies, SMEs, Clusters, green energy, green course, environment, greeningAbstract
Introduction. In light of the growing risks associated with global warming, the sustainable development of small
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) has gained strategic importance. Their focus on environmental responsibility, the adoption of “green” technologies, and the reduction of ecological impact position SMEs as key contributors to sustainable economic growth.
Problem Statement. The imperative of environmental protection has necessitated the development and adoption of green technologies. These technologies offer substantial potential for improving the performance and competitiveness of SMEs, particularly within the framework of eco-clusters.
Purpose. This study aims to examine the legal definition and framework of “green” technologies; to assess the
feasibility of their implementation by SMEs as members of eco-clusters; to identify the principal areas of legal
regulation related to green technologies; and to determine the current level of SME awareness regarding opportunities, benefits, and barriers associated with green technology.
Materials and Methods. The research is based on a combination of general scientific and specialized legal
methodologies. The source material includes publications by Ukrainian and international scholars, as well as relevant legislation from Ukraine and the European Union.
Results. A comparative analysis of legal doctrine and regulatory practice in Ukraine and the EU has revealed key indicators for guiding the continued green transformation of SMEs in alignment with international standards. Factors influencing SMEs’ awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with green technologies have been identified. The study has highlighted the role of eco-clusters as drivers of SME innovation, and has outlined a set of incentive markers essential for motivating SMEs to integrate green technologies in support of sustainable development and responsible environmental behavior.
Conclusions. The implementation of the green technology concept, as a manifestation of sustainable innovation for SMEs, requires further refi nement within Ukrainian legal frameworks. The proposed measures have de monst rated their potential to address pressing environmental issues, mitigate ecological impact, and support climate adaptation strategies. The promotion of green technologies among SMEs, particularly through eco-cluster participation, has emerged as a critical pathway for enhancing their
innovation capacity and environmental accountability.
Downloads
References
Green technologies, innovations and intellectual property. Information report. State Organization “Ukrainian National Office”. URL: https://nipo.gov.ua/zvit-zeleni-tekhnolohii-ip/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR3caiLV9p8syeReoKLKG66Hk62OCUrE8D9EpeevAkKHG5zN6ODpDY3d38_aem_AbKWxO-ZL8I7HFQQAAvIimYBQqhgyIjGYMGeSpJ-yJ-VlKqkS26avaIdxIblOR0ddWMOB4jdHWhDcpqOlP4ftwA_ (Last accessed: 16.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].
Ukraine country Programme. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level Paris, 7—8 June 2023. OECD. URL: https://www.oecd.org/mcm/documents/Ukraine-Country-Programme.pdf (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
OECD and Ukraine implementing a four-year Country Programme. OECD. URL: https://www.oecd.org/country/ ukraine/ (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Musina, L. A., Kvasha, T. K. (2017). Innovations and technologies for the development of a green resource-efficient economy in Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Marin, G., Marzucchi, A., Zoboli, R. (2015). SMEs and barriers to Eco-innovation in the EU: exploring different firm profiles. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25(3), 671—705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0407-7.
Eco-clusters for a green economy. (2012). Outcomes of a European partnership for internationalisation and growth. Belgium. URL: https://greenovate-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Ecoclup_booklet.pdf (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Degong, M., Ullah, F., Khattak, M., Anwar, M. J. S. (2018). Do international capabilities and resources configure firm’s sustainable competitive performance? Research within Pakistani SMEs. Sustainability, 10(11), 4298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114298
Dong, Y., Shi, L. (2010). Eco-innovation: conception, hierarchy and research progress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 2465—2474. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283874068_Eco-innovation_Conception_hierarchy_and_research_ progress (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Evans, N. W., Whitehouse, H., Gooch, M. (2012). Barriers, Successes and Enabling Practices of Education for Sustainability in Far North Queensland Schools: A Case Study. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(2), 121—138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.621995
Guelfo, D. (2023). What Is Green Tech? A Comprehensive Guide to Green Technology in 2023. URL: https://www. netguru.com/blog/what-is-greentech (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Bhardwaj, M. N. (2015). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Green Technology. Journal of Basic and Applied Engineering Research, 2(22), 1957—1960. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357269773_The_Advantages_ and_Disadvantages_of_Green_Technology (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Kenton, W. (2024). What Is Green Tech? How It Works, Types, Adoption, and Examples. Part of the Series Guide to Green Investing. Investopedia. URL: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/green_tech.asp (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Musina, L. A. (2012). Green technologies and innovations as a driver of economic growth: state policy and development prospects. Scientific and technical information, 4, 22—28. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/NTI_2012_4_7 (Last accessed: 16.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].
Puig, D., Haselip, J. A., Bakhtiari, F. (2018). The mismatch between the in-country determinants of technology transfer, and the scope of technology transfer initiatives under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(5), 659—669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784- 018-9405-1 .
Adamiuk, D. I. (2015). The Concept of Technology: Establishing the Content and Correlation with Other Related Concepts. Law and innovative society, 1(4), 34—41. URL: https://apir.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Adamjuk.pdf (Last accessed: 16.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].
Rozghon, O. V. (2024). Ways to Protect Infringed Rights to Technology: Civil and Commercial Law Aspects. Economics and Law, 1, 46—59. https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2024.01.046 [in Ukrainian].
Hlibko, S. V., Rozghon, O. V. (Eds.). (2021). Technology transfer in the legal regulation of the innovation process in Ukraine: essence, forms, stages of implementation. Legal support for the effectiveness of the innovation process in Ukraine: a monograph. Kharkiv. URL: https://ndipzir.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/InnovProcess21/Part_12.pdf (Last accessed: 16.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].
Alipour, A., Rahimpour, M. (2020). Sustainability Barriers in SMEs: A study of strength of sustainability barriers and practical solutions in Green product lifecycle at SMEs: thesis. Jönköping University, Internationella Handelshögskolan. URL: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1462056/FULLTEXT01.pdf (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Durdyev, S., Zavadskas, E. K., Thurnell, D., Banaitis, A., Ihtiyar, A. (2018). Sustainable Construction Industry in Cambodia: Awareness, Drivers and Barriers. Sustainability, 10(2), 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020392
Deng, W., Yang, T., Tang, L., Tang, Y.-T. (2016). Barriers and policy recommendations for developing green buildings from local government perspective: A case study of Ningbo China. Intelligent Buildings International, 10(2), 61—77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2016.1248342
Mykiyevych, M. M., Andrusevich, N. I., Budyakova, T. O. (2004). European environmental law: a textbook. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Barsoumian, S., Severin, A., Spek van der T. (2011). Eco-innovation and national cluster policies in Europe — a qualitative review, Greenovate! Europe EEIG European Cluster Observatory Brussels. URL: https://greenovate-europe.eu/ wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ECO_Greenovate-Europe-cluster-policies-2011.pdf (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Carpinetti, C. R. L., Galdámez, E. C., Gerolamo, C. M. (2008). A measurement system for managing performance of industrial clusters. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57 (5), 405—419. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400810881854
de Jesus Pacheco, D. A., ten Caten, C. S., Jung, C. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Navas, H. V. G., Cruz-Machado, V. A. (2017). Ecoinnovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2277—2287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.049
Dohse, D. (2007). Cluster‐Based Technology Policy — The German Experience. Industry & Innovation, 14(1), 69—94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130848.
Kurniasih, J., Kurniasih, A., Z. A., Asmai, S. A., Wibowo, A. B. (2023). System Dynamics Approach in Supporting the Achievement of the Sustainable Development on MSMEs: A Collection of Case Studies. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(6), 990-998. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2023.01406106.
López, J. J., Gutiérrez, M. B., Malpica, H. P. E., Barquero, R. (2016). Determinants of performance cluster: Case applied to furniture industry in Barranquilla, Colombia. TEC Empresarial, 10(1), 29—38. https://doi.org/10.18845/te.v10i1.2532
Hasan, M. N. (2016). Measuring and understanding the engagement of Bangladeshi SMEs with sustainable and socially responsible business practices: an ISO 26000 perspective. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(3), 584—610. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-08-2015-0125
Mercado-Caruso, N., Segarra-Oña, M., Ovallos-Gazabon, D., Peiró-Signes, A. (2020). Identifying Endogenous and Exo ge n ous Indicators to Measure Eco-Innovation within Clusters. Sustainability, 12(15), 6088. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156088.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77—90.
Rodrigues, M., Franco, M. (2023). Green Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): A Qualitative Approach. Sustainability, 15(5), 4510. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054510.
Prokhorchuk, S. V. (2016). The functioning of the innovation cluster in the region. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, 6(3), 12—16 [in Ukrainian].
Serik, O. D. (2009). The concept of clusters and its role in the formation of a competitive economy. Bulletin of Khmelnytsky National University, 3(2), 214—217. URL: http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/ekon/2009_3_2/pdf/214-217. pdf (Last accessed: 16.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].
Atamanova, Y. E. (2010). On the issue of legal definition of innovation activity. Bulletin of the Yaroslav Mudryi National Law Academy of Ukraine. Series “Economic Theory and Law”, 1, 124—133 [in Ukrainian].
Koscyk, R. S. (2012). Stages of the process of commercialization of innovative products of industrial enterprises. Bulletin of Sumy State University. Series: Economics, 4, 150—154. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VSU_ekon_2012_4_22 (Last accessed: 16.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].
Baumol, W. J. (2002). The free-market innovation machine: Analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism. Princeton. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wpz8j (Last accessed: 16.07.2024). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851638
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197—218. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441
Kammerer, D. (2009). The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation. Ecological Economics, 68(8-9), 2285—2295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.016
IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Еds. Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A.). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104. URL: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4_syr_full_ report.pdf (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Climate Change: Technology Development and Technology Transfer. Background paper. (2008). Prepared for the Beijing High-level Conference on Climate Change: Technology Development and Technology Transfer Beijing. United Na tions Department of Economic and Social Affairs [in Ukrainian]. URL: https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/sdissues/ energy/op/beijing_hlccc_nov08/back_paper.pdf/ (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
WIPO and the Sustainable Development Goals. The Impact of Innovation. WIPO. URL: https://www.wipo.int/sdgs/ en/story.html. (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Rojas Alvarado, R., Estelles-Miguel, S. (2017). Agglomerations and firm performance: Who benefits and how much? Regional Studies, 52(3), 338—349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1297895
Integration of education, science and business: a monograph. (2022). (Ed. A. V. Cherep). Zaporizhzhia [in Ukrainian].
Madaleno, M., Nathan, M., Overman, H., Waights, S. (2018). Incubators, accelerators and regional economic development. URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp11856.pdf (Last accessed: 16.07.2024). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3261715
Peiró-Signes, Á., Segarra-Oña, M. (2018). How past decisions affect future behavior on eco-innovation: An empirical study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1233—1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2071
Hollensen, S. (2007). Global Marketing: A Decision-Oriented Approach. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River. URL: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1411656 (Last accessed: 16.07.2024).
Panasiuk, T. P. (2019). Methodical approaches to analyzing the efficiency of economic activity of the enterprise. Actual problems of economy and management: a collection of scientific works of young scientists, 13. URL: https://ela.kpi.ua/ handle/123456789/29393. (Last accessed: 16.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].
Alcalde-Heras, H., Carrillo, F. (2023). Exploring the impact of collaboration on eco-innovation in SMEs: a contribution to the business modes of innovation framework. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-05-2023-0435 .
Koiralla, S. Why SMEs matter for green and inclusive growth. Green Industry. URL: https://www.greenindustryplatform. org/uk/blog/why-smes-matter-green-and-inclusive-growth?f0=&f10=&f11=&f12=&f13=&f14=&f15=&f16=&f17=&f18= &f19=&f1=&f20=&f21=&f22=&f23=&f24=&f25=&f26=&f27=&f28=&f29=&f2=&f30=&f31=&f32=&f33=&f34=&f35= &f36=&f37=&f38=&f3=&f4=&f5=&f6=&f7=&f8=&f9=&facets_query= (Last accessed: 16.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].
Lopez, D. F. J., Montalvo, C. (2015). A comprehensive review of the evolving and cumulative nature of eco-innovation in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 30—43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.007
Lopez, D. F. J., Bastein, T., Tukker, A. (2019). Business Model Innovation for Resource-efficiency, Circularity and Cleaner Production: What 143 Cases Tell Us. Ecological Economics, 155, 20—35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.009
Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M. (2016). The driving forces of process eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Insights from Slovenia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 812—825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.002
Scarpellini, S., Valero-Gil, J., Rivera-Torres, P., Garces-Ayerbe, C. (2017). Analysis of the generation of economic results in the different phases of the pro-environmental change process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1473—1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.114
Horbach, J., Rammer, C., Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112—122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., Segarra-Oña, M., Peiró-Signes, Á., Payá-Martínez, A. M., Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2015). Segmentation of the Spanish automotive industry with respect to the environmental orientation of firms: towards an ad-hoc vertical policy to promote eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 238—244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.034
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., Wen, C.-T. (2006). The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331—339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B. (2008). Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, 1, 3—15. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035305421.00007
Kemp, R., Rammer, C., Arundel, A. (2023). Measuring environmental (eco-) innovation. Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, 177—196. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800883024.00020
Segarra-Oña, M., Peiró-Signes, A., Albors-Garrigós, J., Miguel-Molina, B. (2016). Testing the Social Innovation Construct: An Empirical Approach to Align Socially Oriented Objectives, Stakeholder Engagement, and Environmental Sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(1), 15—27. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1388
Del Brío, J. Á., Junquera, B. (2003). A review of the literature on environmental innovation management in SMEs: implications for public policies. Technovation, 23(12), 939—948. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00036-6
Fresner, J. M., Morea, F., Krenn, C., Uson, J. A., Tomasi, F. (2017). Energy efficiency in small and medium enterprises: Les sons learned from 280 energy audits across Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1650—1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.126
Darnall, N., Gallagher, D., Andrews, R., Amaral, D. (2000). Environmental management systems: Opportunities for improved environmental and business strategy? Environmental Quality Management, 9(3), 1—9. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6483(200021)9:3<1::AID-TQEM1>3.0.CO;2-L
Al-Eisawi, D., Serrano, A., Koulouri, T. (2020). The effect of organisational absorptive capacity on business intelligence systems efficiency and organisational efficiency. Industrial Management & Data Systems. Ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print, 121(2), 519—544. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-02-2020-0120
Nygaard, I., Hansen, U. E. (2015). The conceptual and practical challenges to technology categorisation in the preparation of technology needs assessments. Climatic Change, 131(3), 371—385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1367-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Copyright Notice Authors published in the journal “Science and Innovation” agree to the following conditions: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of their work (article) published in the journal “Science and Innovation” (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish in their book), while confirming its initial publication in the journal “Science and innovation.” Authors are allowed to place their work on the Internet (for example, in institutional repositories or on their website).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
