УПРАВЛІННЯ РОЗВИТКОМ ПРОМИСЛОВОСТІ В УМОВАХ СИСТЕМНИХ ДИСПРОПОРЦІЙ: РОЛЬ СТРУКТУРНОГО ФАКТОРУ У ЗМІНІ МАТЕРІАЛОМІСТКОСТІ ПЕРЕРОБНОЇ ПРОМИСЛОВОСТІ УКРАЇНИ

A. NEPRAN; S. STEPANENKO; N. DOVGOPOL; Yu. OVSIUCHENKO; V. BATIH

doi:10.15407/scine21.06.049

Authors

A. NEPRAN Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8329-7123
S. STEPANENKO Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6132-328X
N. DOVGOPOL Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2438-0904
Yu. OVSIUCHENKO Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-1799
V. BATIH Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3883-3648

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/scine21.06.049

Keywords:

industrial production, processing industry, structural shifts, material intensity of products, sold products.

Abstract

Introduction. The post-war reconstruction of Ukraine’s industrial sector shall proceed in line with development
priorities that enhance competitiveness, reduce resource and material intensity, and improve labor productivity.
Problem Statement. Ukraine’s industrial structure has long been dominated by low-technology, resourceoriented enterprises with limited value added, which has largely determined the persistently high material and energy intensity of production.
Purpose. This study has examined the impact of structural shifts within the manufacturing sector on material
intensity and has substantiated the strategic directions for its recovery.
Materials and Methods. The index and coefficient methods have been applied. The analysis has been based on data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, including indicators of sales volumes and material costs.
Results. The study has assessed the influence of sectoral structural shifts on production efficiency. It has been
established that during 2020–2022, the structural factor has contributed to a reduction in the average material intensity of manufactured products — by 15.2% in 2020, by 13.1% in 2021, and only marginally in 2022. The findings have demonstrated that the recovery of the manufacturing sector driven by high- and medium-technology industries ensures the largest decline in average material intensity, equivalent to 13.1 kopecks. Moreover, production growth based on these industries has required approximately 30% less material expenditure compared with traditional low-technology manufacturing.
Conclusions. Recovery centered on low- and medium-technology industries has demanded an additional 100 billion units of material resources. The structural restructuring of Ukraine’s manufacturing sector shall therefore be grounded in a reorientation of state investment policy toward high- and medium-technology industries to secure sustainable reductions in material intensity and improve long-term competitiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Vyshnevskyi, V. P., Zbarazska, L. O., Zanizdra, M. Yu., Chekina, V. D. (2016). National model of neoindustrial development of Ukraine (monograph.) (Ed. V. P. Vishnevskyi). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Strategic planning of post-war industrial development: new determinants and imperatives (Ed. L.V. Dejneko). (2024). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Zakharchenko, V. I. (2017). Structural transformations of the national industrial complex in the context of post-industrial development. Industrial economics, 2(78), 37—60 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2017.02.037

Kozachenko, H. V., Pohorelov, Yu. S. (2024). Development of strategic industries of Ukraine in the context of national economic security: theoretical foundations. Industrial economics, 3(107), 37—51 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2024.03.037

Herasymchuk, V. H. (2021). Industrial complex development strategy: intentions, implementation mechanisms, responsibility. Economic Bulletin of the National Technical University “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, 18, 23—29. https://doi.org/ 10.20535/2307-5651.18.2021.230058 [in Ukrainian].

Ischuk, S. O., Sozans’kyj, L. J. (2024). Optimization of the structure of the processing industry of Ukraine based on the criterion of increasing the technological efficiency of production and reducing their import dependence. Industrial Economics, 1(105), 16—38. htpps://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2024.01.016 [in Ukrainian].

Shadura-Nekyporets’ N., Minina O., Derĳ Zh. (2023). Structural transformations of the economy: the impact of the war and the search for a new economic paradigm for Ukraine. Problems and prospects of economics and management, 4(36), 49—60 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.25140/2411-5215-2023-4(36)-49-60

Okhten, O. O., Dasiv, A. F. (2023). Baseline scenario for long-term development of national industry until 2035. Industrial economics, 1(101), 56—68. htpps://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2023.01.056

Shovkun, I. A. (2021). Structural shifts: impact on productivity and growth of the Ukrainian economy. Economics and forecasting, 3, 59—76; 4, 142—155. https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2021.03.059 [in Ukrainian].

Novikova, O. F., Zaloznova, Yu. S., Antoniuk, V. P., Khandiy, O. O., Azmuk, N. A., …, Maltsev, O. Yu. (2024). Assessment of problems and opportunities for providing industry with labor force in conditions of martial law and post-war development of Ukraine: scientific report. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Sobkevych, O. V., Shevchenko, A. V., Rusan, V. M., Zhurakovs’ka, L. A. (2023). Priorities for ensuring the sustainability of industry and the agrarian sector of the Ukrainian economy in conditions of full-scale war: analytical supplement. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Sobkevych, O. V. (2024). Assessment of the industrial competitiveness of the economy and the technological potential of the industry of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Ishchuk, S. O., Sozanskyi, L. Y. (2021). Modeling the impact of structural parameters of the processing industry on its efficiency (using the example of EU countries). Industrial Economics, 1(93), 60—78 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2021.01.060

Dejneko, L. V., Kushnirenko, O. M., Tsyplitskaya, O. O., Gakhovich, N. G., Sheludko, E. I., Wenger, L. A., Zagorodnya, M. Yu., Zarudna, O. S. (2022). Future challenges for the industrial development of Ukraine: scientific report. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Dejneko, L. V. Kushnirenko, O. M., Tsyplitskaya, O. O., Gakhovich, N. G., Sheludko, E. I., Wenger, L. A., Zagorod nya, M. Yu., Zarudna, O. S. (2022). Ukrainian industry facing the challenges of the future: in search of answers and solutions: collective monograph. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Fukushima, D. (2023). Strategic Planning in a Highly Uncertain World. Toffler Associates. May 15.

Sanyaolu, Р. The impacts of industrial revolution to modern state system. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331260774_The_impacts_of_industrial_revolution_to_modern_state_system/ citation/download (Last acces sed: 20.04.2025).

Jacobs, M., Hatfield, I., King, L., Raikes, L., Stirling, A. (2017). Industrial Strategy: Steering structural changes in the UK economy. Discussion Paper of IPPR Commission on Economic Justice. URL: https://www.ippr.org/files/2017-11/ 1511445722_industrial-strategy-cej-november17.pdf (Last accessed: 20.04.2025).

Jackson Grayson, C., O’Dell, C. (1988). American Bussiness: A Two Warning. New York.

Varenichenko, L. L., Vasechko, O. O., Gonchar, O. V., Danilko, V. K., Danchenko, E. S., Yegorov, I. Yu., Zhuikova, E. M., Zhuk, O. P., ..., Chebanova V. G. (2012). Statistical dictionary. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].