Standards-Based Approaches of Ukraine and India to the Determination of Wind Loads

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/scine22.01.070

Keywords:

wind load, aerodynamic coefficient, low-rise building, Indian standard, Ukrainian standard

Abstract

Introduction. The calculation of wind load on building structures is an indispensable component of modern building design, therefore, analyzing the experience of different countries of the world in this aspect is an important and relevant task.
Problem Statement. The main difficulty in taking wind load into account during design is the diversity of principles and approaches to its definition, which is based on national ideas and value system in different countries of the world.
Purpose. Comparison of applicable regulatory approaches to determining wind loads in Ukraine and India using the example of a low-rise industrial building with an analysis of the system of infl uencing factors and the degree of their consideration.
Materials and Methods. The research was conducted based on an analysis of the approaches of the applicable Ukrainian and Indian standards for determining wind loads. A low-rise industrial building of rectangular shape in plan with a gable roof was taken as the object of the study.
Results. It has been established that the applicable standards of Ukraine and India use a fundamentally similar model of wind load, which is supplemented by a system of correction factors to take into account local operating conditions. However, the Indian standard takes into account 12 factors of local conditions against 10 factors in the Ukrainian standard. The methodology for taking them into account differs qualitatively in these standards. At the same time, the value of the aerodynamic coefficient has a
quantitative level of correlation within 50 % according to the standards of both countries. For a low-rise industrial building with a gable roof, the finally determined level of wind load according to the standards of Ukraine and India differs by the amount for side facades — up to 25 %, for end facades — up to 40 %, for the roof — up to 30 %. The height wind profile for the Indian standard is flatter and has a quantitative correlation level within 50 % for heights up to 20 m above the ground.
Conclusions. The obtained results provide an opportunity to analyze the applicable national standards of Ukraine
and should be used for their improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bannikov, D. O. (2011). Analysis of the causes of accidents of steel capacitive structures for bulk materials. Metallurgical and Mining Industry, 3(5), 243—249.

Hezentsvei, Y., Bannikov, D. (2020). Effectiveness evaluation of steel strength improvement for pyramidal-prismatic bunkers. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 2(27), 30—38. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2020.001146

Bannikov, D. O., Tiutkin, O. L. (2020). Prospective directions of the development of loose medium mechanics. Science and Innovation, 16(29), 42—50. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine16.02.045

Pichugin, S. F., Klochko, L. A. (2020). Accidents analysis of steel vertical tanks. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 73, 193—204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42939-3_21

Petrenko, V., Bannikov, D., Kharchenko, V., Tkach, T. (2022). Regularities of the deformed state of the geotechnical system soil base-micropile. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 970(1), 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/970/1/012028

Kazakevitch, M. I., Horokhov, Ye. V., Khorol’sky, M. S., Turbin, S. V. (2002). Stabilization of a power transmission line oscillations. International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research, 29, 3—4, 152—161. https://doi.org/10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.v29.i3-4.190

Pichugin, S. F. (2022). Trends in the development of wind load codes for building structures. Modern technologies and methods of calculations in construction, 18, 98—116. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2022-8(18)-12 [in Ukrainian].

Pichugin, S. (2021). Many years of experience of standarding the medium component of wind load on building structures. Academic journal. Industrial Machine Building, Civil Engineering, 2(57), 5—13. https://doi.org/10.26906/znp.2021.57.2578

Kinash, R. I., Guk, J. S. (2010). Zoning of the transcarpathian region by wind load. Collection of scientific papers of the Ukrainian Research Institute of steel structures named after V. M. Shymanovsky, 5, 117—123.

Kinash, R. I., Guk, J. S. (2011). Calculation of wind load by altitudinal and altitudinal-logarithmic coefficients at weather stations of the Transcarpathian region and the peaks of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Collection of scientific works of the Donbass National Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 4(90), 68—74 [in Ukrainian].

Pashynskyi, V. A., Pashynskyi, М. V. (2023). Methods of determining climatic loads according to the data of the regional network of weather stations. Central Ukrainian National Technical University, 7(38)-І, 77—85. https://doi.org/10.32515/2664-262X.2023.7(38).1.77-85 [in Ukrainian].

Holmes, J. D. (2015). Wind loading of structures. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18029

Repetto, M. P., Solari, G. (2004). Equivalent static wind actions on vertical structures. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 92(5), 335—357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.01.002

Zhou, Y., Asce, M., Kijewski, T., Asce, S. M., Kareem, A. (2003). Aerodynamic loads on tall buildings: Interactive database. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(3), 394—404. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:3(394)

Shao, S., Tian, Yj., Yang, Q. S., Stathopoulos, T. (2019). Wind-induced cladding and structural loads on low-rise buildings with 4:12-sloped hip roofs. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 193, 103948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.103948

Pfretzschner, K. S., Gupta, R., Mille,r T. H. (2014). Practical modeling for wind load paths in a realistic lightframe wood house. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 28(3), 430—439. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000448

Yan, L., Liu, Z., Ruan, X., Xu, B. (2024). Separation-hybrid models for simulating nonstationary stochastic turbulent wind fields. Wind and Structures, 1(38), 1—13. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2024.38.1.001

Demartino, Cr., Sun, Z., Matteoni, G., Georgakis, Chr. T. (2023). Quasi-steady three-degrees-of-freedom aerodynamic model of inclined/yawed prisms: Formulation and instability for galloping and static divergence. Wind and Structures, 1(37), 57—78. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2023.37.1.057

Lee, H. S., Jeong, S. Y., Kang, T. H.-K. (2023). Updates of Korean Design Standard (KDS) on the wind load assessment and performance-based wind design. Wind and Structures., 2(37), 117—131. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2023.37.2.117

Ji, X. (2023). Multivariate extreme wind loads: copula-based analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1(149), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0002174

Altunsu, E., Gunes, O., Sar, A. (2022). Design principles for wind turbine earthquake and wind load combinations. International journal of steel structures, 3(22), 791—804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-022-00606-1

Bannikov, D., Radkevich, A., Nikiforova, N. (2019). Features of the design of steel frame structures in India for seismic areas. Materials Science Forum, 968, 348—354. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.968.348

DBN V.1.2-2:2006. (2006). System for ensuring the reliability and safety of construction sites. Loads and actions. Design standards. With amendments No. 1 and No. 2. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Scott, H. (2004). Defining the wind: the beaufort scale, and how a 19th-century admiral turned science into poetry. Crown.

SNiP 2/01/07-85*. (1988). Loads and actions. Moscow [in Ukrainian].

IS 875-3. (2015). Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. Part 3 — Wind loads: third rev. BIS.

Lakshmanan, N., Gomathinayagam, S., Harikrishna, P., Abraham, A., Ganapathi, S. Ch. (2009). Basic wind speed map of India with long-term hourly wind data. Current Science, 2(96)-7, 911—922

Downloads

Published

2026-02-15

How to Cite

BANNIKOV, D., NIKIFOROVA, N., KOSIACHEVSKA, S., & MUNTIAN, A. (2026). Standards-Based Approaches of Ukraine and India to the Determination of Wind Loads. Science and Innovation, 22(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine22.01.070

Issue

Section

The Scientific Basis of Innovation