Self-Assessment of the Company Innovation Management System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/scine21.06.104

Keywords:

Innovation management system, Innovation management, evaluation, standard, monitoring, improvement.

Abstract

Introduction. The innovation component has been embedded in the activities and developments of most companies and research–educational institutions, which has necessitated the establishment of formal management procedures and the availability of tools for their implementation.
Problem Statement. The Technical Committee ISO/TC 279 Innovation Management has developed the ISO 56000 series of standards to guide the implementation of innovation management systems within companies. While these standards have provided a general framework, they have not proposed a practical mechanism for evaluating such systems.
Purpose. This study has sought to summarize the key factors for evaluating innovation management systems
in accordance with the ISO 56000 series of standards and to develop a questionnaire enabling companies of different ownership types to conduct a self-assessment of implementation.
Materials and Methods. The study has employed a combination of analytical methods, surveys, expert evaluation, case studies, and SWOT analysis, which have made it possible to assess the degree of innovation management implementation across organizations of varying types. The research materials have included ISO standards, self-assessment forms, enterprise analytical reports, survey data, and practical examples of innovation system applications.

Results. This study has summarized the structure and objectives of the ISO 56000 series of standards and identified the factors influencing the effectiveness of corporate innovation management systems. On the basis of analytical methods, a questionnaire has been developed to facilitate the evaluation of innovation management systems. This tool has enabled companies to select appropriate strategies for determining the maturity level of such systems and to enhance competitiveness. Case studies have demonstrated how both commercial enterprises and public-sector organizations have applied the self-assessment, which has allowed them to identify previously overlooked factors. Furthermore, the research has highlighted distinctive features of innovation
management systems across different organizational types.
Conclusions. The self-assessment of innovation management systems has proven to be a valuable instrument for improving organizational performance and achieving strategic objectives, irrespective of ownership structure or institutional mission.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M-Chukri, I., Alptekin, D. (2021). Innovation Management Systems and Standards: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research. Sustainability, 13(15), 8151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158151

Saiz-Alvarez, J. M. (2024). Innovation Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of 50 Years of Research Using VOSviewer® and Scopus. World, 5(4), 901—928. https://doi.org/10.3390/world5040046

Kim, D.-Y., Hwang, Y.-H. (2014). Self-certification framework for technological innovation: a case study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(7), 751—763. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-10-2012-0139

Wellington, L. L. R., Almeida M. F. L., Calili, R. F. (2023). Measuring and Evaluating Organizational Innovation Capacity and Performance from Systemic and Sustainability-Oriented Perspective. Sustainabilit, 15(1), 682. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su15010682

Innovation management — Fundamentals and vocabulary. International standard ISO 56000:2020. February 2020.

Danylenko, Yu. A. (2018). Characteristics and classification of innovation and innovation process. Sci. innov., 14(3), 14—26. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine14.03.014

Innovation management system — Requirements. International standard ISO 56001:2024. September 2024. 22 p.

Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance. International standard ISO 56002:2019. July 2019. 26 p.

Innovation management — Tools and methods for innovation partnership — Guidance. International standard ISO 56003:2019. February 2019. 21 p.

Innovation Management Assessment — Guidance. International standard/Technical report ISO/TR 56004:2019. February 2019. 30 p.

Innovation management — Tools and methods for intellectual property management — Guidance. International standard ISO 56005:2020. November 2020. 35 p.

Innovation management — Tools and methods for strategic intelligence management — Guidance. International standard ISO 56006:2021. November 2021. 11 p.

Innovation management — Tools and methods for managing opportunities and ideas — Guidance. International standard ISO 56007:2023. August 2023. 60 p.

Innovation management — Tools and methods for innovation operation measurements — Guidance. International standard ISO 56008:2024. April 2024. 73 p.

Innovation management — Illustrative examples of ISO 56000. International standard ISO/TS 56010:2023. September 2023. 15 p.

Innovation Management — Intellectual Property Management. International standard Technical specification CEN/TS 16555-4:2014. December 2014. 33 p.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

DANYLENKO, Y., YURCHYSHYN, O., & HRINCHENKO , H. (2025). Self-Assessment of the Company Innovation Management System. Science and Innovation, 21(6), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine21.06.104

Issue

Section

The World of Innovation