Mean-Variance Optimization: Modeling an Optimal Investment Portfolio in the U.S. Tech Sector

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/scine21.02.101

Keywords:

Optimization, Capital Allocation Line, Efficient Frontier, Python Programming

Abstract

Introduction. Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) provides a quantitative framework for making informed investment decisions. The highly variable and uncertain U.S. technology sector challenges traditional investment approaches, necessitating methods that better address its unique risk-return trade-offs.
Problem Statement. Traditional investment strategies frequently fail to capture the dynamic and volatile
nature of the tech market. They rely on limited data and inefficient calculation processes, resulting in suboptimal
asset allocation. One of the advanced methods for refining portfolio formation strategies tailored to the tech market is the mean-variance optimization (MVO) method.
Purpose. To optimize mean-variance optimization (MVO) to construct optimal portfolios for the U.S. tech sector, leveraging contributions from MPT, Sharpe’s optimization techniques, and Tobin’s asset allocation model.
Materials and Methods. Historical stock data serves as the basis for implementing MVO with Python to construct portfolios that include a risk-free asset, enabling the calculation of the Capital Allocation Line (CAL) and the upper Efficient Frontier. The geometric mean evaluates expected returns, improving long-term predictability
and portfolio comparability, while daily returns enhance the model’s sensitivity.
Results. The study has demonstrated that optimized portfolios achieve higher Sharpe ratios and superior riskreturn characteristics, outperforming benchmarks through effi cient computation.
Conclusions. The MVO is an effective investment tool for the tech sector, enabling informed asset selection and
portfolio construction. This study has highlighted the importance of integrating iterative calculation processes and advanced computational techniques to adapt traditional investment strategies to the extensive data requirements of today’s markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Contributors to Wikimedia projects. Modern portfolio theory. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_portfolio_ theory (Last accessed: 25.01.2024).

Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974

Tobin, J. (1958). Portfolio Selection. Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk. The Review of Economic Studies, 25(2), 65—86. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2296205 (Last accessed: 23.02.2024). https://doi.org/10.2307/2296205

Balvers, J. R. (2001). Foundations of asset pricing. Virginia.

Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924119

Myers, S., Allen, F., Brealey, R. (2011). Principles of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/2977928

Ahmadi, S. A., Peivandizadeh, A. (2022). Sustainable Portfolio Optimization Model Using PROMETHEE Ranking: A Case Study of Palm Oil Buyer Companies. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 1—11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8935213

Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910098

Bauer, G. H., Vorkink, K. (2011). Forecasting multivariate realized stock market volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 160(1), 93—101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.021

Downloads

Published

2025-04-12

How to Cite

SHOLOPAK, V., & TRETIAK, D. (2025). Mean-Variance Optimization: Modeling an Optimal Investment Portfolio in the U.S. Tech Sector. Science and Innovation, 21(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine21.02.101

Issue

Section

The Scientific Basis of Innovation