Influence of the Conditions of Alkaline Pretreatment of Vegetable Raw Material before Hydrolysis in a Rotor Pulsation Device on the Cellulose Conversion

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/scine20.06.030

Keywords:

fuel ethanol, pretreatment, alkali, cellulose conversion, cellulase complex

Abstract

Introduction. The growing global energy demand, limited fossil fuel resources, and increasing greenhouse gas
emissions highlight the need for expanded use of renewable energy sources, particularly biomass.
Problem Statement. A significant drawback in the production of bioethanol is its high cost, primarily due to
the presence of hemicellulose and lignin.
Purpose. This study aims to determine the effect of treating an alkaline suspension of wheat straw in a rotary pulsation device on the degree of cellulose conversion during enzymatic hydrolysis, a critical step in the production
of fuel ethanol.
Materials and Methods. The raw material is pre-crushed wheat straw. The experiments have been conducted
with the use of a rotary pulsation device in an experimental plant.
Results. It has been found that the combined physical effects of the discrete pulse energy input method and
reduced straw particle size significantly increase the lignin extraction, from 40.0% at an average particle size of
2—1 mm to 62.0% at an average particle size of 0.4—0.1 mm. Additionally, the treatment of an alkaline suspension of wheat straw at 90 оC for one hour, at alkali concentrations ranging from 1 to 4% (wt./wt.), results in an
increase in the cellulose conversion during enzymatic hydrolysis from 38% to 65.8%. Additionally, a corresponding decrease in the lignin content, from 17.1% to 3.16% has been reported.
Conclusions. Increasing alkali concentration during the alkaline pretreatment of wheat straw using the discrete-pulse energy input method in a rotary pulsation device enhances the rate of cellulose conversion during
subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mele, M., Gurrieri, A. R., Morelli, G., Magazzino, C. (2021). Nature and climate change eff ects on economic growth: an LSTM experiment on renewable energy resources. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 41127—41134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13337-3

Daily demand for crude oil worldwide from 2006 to 2020, with a forecast until 2026. URL: https://www.statista.com/ statistics/271823/daily-global-crude-oil-demand-since-2006/ (Last accessed: 20.04.2024).

Statistical Review of World Energy. URL: https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review/resources-and-data-downloads (Last accessed: 20.04.2024).

Teklit Gebregiorgis Ambaye, Mentore Vaccari, Adrián Bonilla-Petriciolet, Shiv Prasad, Eric D. van Hullebusch, Sami Rtimi. (2021). Emerging technologies for biofuel production: A critical review on recent progress, challenges and perspectives. Journal of Environmental Management, 290, 112627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112627

Demirbas, A. (2008). The Importance of bioethanol and biodiesel from biomass. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 3(2), 177—185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240600815117

Robak, K., Balcerek, M. (2018). Review of second generation bioethanol production from residual biomass. Food Technolo gy and Biotechnology, 56(2), 174—187. https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5428

Sangita Mahapatra, Dilip Kumar, Brajesh Singh, Pravin Kumar Sachan. (2021). Biofuels and their sources of production: A review on cleaner sustainable alternative against conventional fuel, in the framework of the food and energy nexus. Energy Nexus, 4, 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2021.100036

Falano, T., Jeswani, H. K., Azapagic, A. (2014). Assessing the environmental sustainability of ethanol from integrated biorefi neries. Biotechnology Journal, 9(6), 753—765. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201300246

Gerbrandt, K., Chu, P. L., Simmonds, A., Mullins, K. A., MacLean, H. L., Griffi n, W. M., Saville, B. A. (2016). Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review of key factors and methods aff ecting calculated GHG emissions and energy use. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 38, 63—70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2015.12.021

Annual World Fuel Ethanol Production (Mil. Gal.) URL: https://ethanolrfa.org/markets-and-statistics/annual-ethanolproduction (Last accessed: 20.04.2024).

Datta, A., Hossain, A., Roy, S. (2019). An Overview on Biofuels and Their Advantages and Disadvantages. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 31(8), 1851—1858. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2019.22098

Jeswani, H. K., Chilvers, A., Azapagic, A. (2020). Environmental sustainability of biofuels: a review. Proc. R. Soc. A., 476, 20200351. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0351

Edeh, I. (2021). Bioethanol Production: An Overview. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94895

Toquero, C., Bolado, S. (2014). Eff ect of four pretreatments on enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation of wheat straw. Infl uence of inhibitors and washing. Bioresource technology, 157, 68—76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech. 2014.01.090

Kumar, A. K., Sharma, S. (2017). Recent updates on diff erent methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: А re view. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 4, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-017-0137-9

Jankovičová, B., Hutňan, M., Nagy Czölderová, M., Hencelová, K., Imreová, Z. (2022). Comparison of acid and alkaline pre-treatment of lignocellulosic materials for biogas production. Plant Soil and Environment, 68(4), 195—204. https://doi.org/10.17221/421/2021-PSE

Xu, J.-K., Sun, R.-C. (2016). Recent Advances in Alkaline Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass. In: Biomass Fractionation Technologies for a Lignocellulosic Feedstock Based Biorefi nery (Ed. Solange I. Mussatto). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-802323-5.00019-0

Mafa, M. S., Malgas, S., Bhattacharya, A., Rashamuse, K., Pletschke, B. I. (2020). The Eff ects of Alkaline Pretreatment on Agricultural Biomasses (Corn Cob and Sweet Sorghum Bagasse) and Their Hydrolysis by a Termite-Derived Enzyme Cocktail. Agronomy, 10(8), 1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081211

Byun, J., Cha, Y.-L., Park, S.-M., Kim, K.-S., Lee, J.-E., Kang, Y.-G. (2020). Lignocellulose Pretreatment Combining Continuous Alkaline Single-Screw Extrusion and Ultrasonication to Enhance Biosugar Production. Energies, 13, 5636. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215636

Wang, X., Fan, D., Han, Y., Xu, J. (2022). Multivariable Analysis Reveals the Key Variables Related to Lignocellulosic Biomass Type and Pretreatment before Enzymolysis. Catalysts, 12, 1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12101142

Zheng, Q., Zhou, T., Wang, Y., Cao, X., Wu, S., Zhao, M., Wang, H., Xu, M., Zheng, B., Zheng, J., Xiong Guan, X. (2018). Pretreatment of wheat straw leads to structural changes and improved enzymatic hydrolysis. Scientifi c Reports, 8, 1321. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19517-5

Dolinsky, A. A. (Ed). (2015). Micro- and nano-level processes in DPIE technologies. Kyiv [in Russian].

Sablii, L. A., Obodovych, O. M., Sydorenko, V. V., Sheyko, T. V. (2020). Study of wheat straw delignifi cation in a rotarypulsation apparatus. Acta Periodica Technologica, 51, 103—111. https://doi.org/10.2298/APT2051103S

Xu, J., Cheng, J. J., Sharma-Shivappa, R. R., Burns, J. C. (2010). Lime pretreatment of switchgrass at mild temperatures for ethanol production. Bioresource Technology, 101(8), 2900—2903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009. 12.015

Wati, L., Kumari, S., Kundu, B. S. (2007). Paddy straw as substrate for ethanol production. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 47(1), 26—29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0005-y

Pramasari, D. A., Haditjaroko, L., Sunarti, T. C., Hermiati, E., Syamsu, K. (2017). The Eff ectiveness of Physical and Alkali Hydrothermal Pretreatment in Improving Enzyme Susceptibility of Sweet Sorghum Bagasse. Jurnal Bahan Alam Terbarukan, 6(2), 118—131. https://doi.org/10.15294/jbat.v6i2.9910

Yang, Y., Zhang, M., Zhao, J., Wang, D. (2022). Eff ects of particle size on biomass pretreatment and hydrolysis performances in bioethanol conversion. Biomass Conversion and Biorefi nery, 1—14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021- 02169-3

Chen, Y., Stevens, M. A., Zhu, Y., Holmes, J., Xu, H. (2013). Understanding of alkaline pretreatment parameters for corn stover enzymatic saccharifi cation. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, 6, 1—10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754- 6834-6-8

Downloads

Published

2024-11-07

How to Cite

BLUME, Y., OBODOVYCH, O., & SYDORENKO, V. (2024). Influence of the Conditions of Alkaline Pretreatment of Vegetable Raw Material before Hydrolysis in a Rotor Pulsation Device on the Cellulose Conversion. Science and Innovation, 20(6), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine20.06.030

Issue

Section

Scientific and Technical Innovation Projects of the National Academy of Sciences