Integrated Assessment of Disturbed Ecosystems Using Remote Sensing Technique

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/scine20.05.003

Keywords:

remote sensing, disturbed ecosystems, warfare, geoinformation technology

Abstract

Introduction. Today, there is a need for a shared vision of restoration of disturbed ecosystems, which is defined as “the process of stopping and reversing degradation, leading to improved ecosystem services and restoration of biodiversity.”
Problem Statement. The assessment and restoration of disturbed ecosystems has become especially relevant for the Ukrainian society now, as warfare has caused large-scale changes in environment and both short-term and long-term consequences for ecosystems in Ukraine.
Purpose. Assessment of ecosystems disturbed as a result of warfare impact by remote sensing.
Materials and Methods. Multispectral satellite imagery, ground truth data and ecosystems characteristics of study area have been used. Remotely sensed data processing, geospatial modelling, and mathematical statistics have been applied.
Results. A warfare impact on the ecosystems of Ukraine has been overviewed. Possibility of using remote sensing methods have been considered; their advantages and disadvantages have been generalized. A demo example of the described technique for assessing the ecosystem conditions along the E40 highway on the west of Kyiv has been shown with the use of multi-time satellite imagery of very high resolution (0.5 m on the ground) between May 2020 and March 2022. The analysis of the obtained maps allows us to assess short-term changes in land cover: a decrease in the area of water bodies, coniferous and leafy plants, an increase in the open soil area. The ecosystem conditions map of the studied area enables identifying plots of high risk.
Conclusions. Integrated remote assessment of the condition of disturbed ecosystems and geospatial analysis of corresponding risks are useful tools for the territory management. Remote sensing techniques are particularly important in the context of largescale warfare. In many cases, only remote sensing techniques can provide information on the condition of ecosystems that are
inaccessible or dangerous for ground-based research. Currently, the proposed approach has been elaborated and tested over other territories, different ecosystems and other data sources. Completed and tested integral geo-information technology will be relevant for the post-war recovery of the territory of Ukraine. Further research should be focused on building a pool of quantitative models for probabilistic assessment of the risk of disruption of various ecosystems under diff erent conditions, as well as on obtaining an array of statistical data to increase the reliability of the resulting maps.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

UN Environment Programme (UNEP) 2021 Annual Report. Nairobi: UNEP Offi ce, 2022, 21 p. URL: https://www.unep. org/resources/annual-report-2021 (Last accessed: 19.06.2023).

Glossary of basic military terms for use in the educational process and scientifi c-technical activity of the National Defense Academy of Ukraine. (2006). (Ed. Mosov S. P.). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Gandziura, V. P. (2020). System analysis of environmental quality. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Yankovskyi, O. (2023). Scorched land. How does the war aff ect the ecology of southern Ukraine? URL: https:// www.radiosvoboda.org/a/novyny-pryazovya-viyna-pivden-ekolohiya-spalena-zemlya/32191731.html (Last accessed: 19.06.2023).

The impact of the war on Ukraine’s forests. (2022). URL: http://epl.org.ua/about-us-posts/vplyv-vij ny-na-lisy-ukrayiny/ (Last accessed: 19.06.2023).

Sobenko, N. (2022). 20% of protected areas of Ukraine suff ered from the war. Russia caused losses of UAH 1.35 trillion. URL: https://suspilne.media/310936-vid-vij ni-postrazdali-20-prirodoohoronnih-teritorij -ukraini-rf-zavdala-zbitkiv-na-135- trln-grn (Last accessed: 19.06.2023).

Yatseno, O. (2022). The war in Ukraine has led to irreparable consequences for the environment — experts. URL: https:// ecopolitic.com.ua/ua/news/ekologi-zasteregli-pro-rujnivnij -vpliv-vij ni-na-prirodu-ukraini (Last accessed: 19.06.2023).

Rusev, I. (2023). Hundreds of dolphins died in the Black Sea: the cause named. URL: https://fl ot2017.com/v-chernommore-pogibli-sotni-delfi nov-nazvana-prichina (Last accessed: 19.06.2023).

Diachuk, M. (2022). Water as a source of life or the germ of war: how the theft of water by the occupiers aff ects the wa ter supply of Ukraine and Crimea. URL: https://ecoaction.org.ua/voda-iak-dzherelo-zhyttia.html (Last accessed: 19.06.2023).

Mygal, M. (2023). War and ecology: why does nature fall victim to armed confl ict? URL: https://iaa.org.ua/articles/ vij na-ta-ekologiya-chomu-pryroda-staye-zhertvoyu-zbrojnogo-konfl iktu (Last accessed: 19.06.2023).

Ovsianyi, K. (2023). Before and after. The consequences of a full-scale war for the envirinment of Ukraine. Satellite view. URL: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/skhemy-ekolohiya-viyna/32284610.html (Last accessed: 19.06.2023).

Kepova, D. (2022). Environmentalists are sounding the alarm; the war is becoming toxic for Ukraine — UN. URL: https:// zn.ua/ukr/WORLD/ekolohi-bjut-na-spolokh-vij na-bukvalno-staje-toksichnoju-dlja-ukrajini-oon.html (Last acces sed: 19.06.2023).

Riener, К. (2023). Environmental consequences of the war in Ukraine and prospects for green reconstruction. URL: https://www.dniprotoday.com/novyny/ekologicni-naslidki-vij ni-v-ukraini-ta-perspektivi-zelenoi-rekonstruk-cii-2606 (Last accessed: 19.06.2023).

Shevchuk, S. A., Vyshnevskyi, V. I., Bilous, O. P. (2022). The use of remote sensing data for investigation of environmental consequences of Russia-Ukraine war. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 15(3), 36—53. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2022-0017.

Vasenko, O. G., Rybalova, O. V., Artemiev, S. R., Gorban, N. S., Korobkova, G. V., Polozentsieva, V. O., Kozlovskaia, O. V., Matsak, A. O., Savichiev, A. A. (2015). Integral and comprehensive environmental assessment. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Dudar, T., Piestova, I., Lubskyi, M., Zhuravel, O., Tymchyshyn, M. (2021). Remote mapping of environmental hazard indicators within the mining area. Collection Papers of the III International Scientifi c-Practical Conference “Modern Trends in Information Systems and Telecommunication Technologies Development” (25—26 January, 2021). Kyiv. P. 17—18.

Stankevich, S. A., Kharytonov, N. N., Dudar, T. V., Kozlova, A. A. (2016). Remote risk assessment of land degradation using satellite imagery and geospatial modeling in Ukraine. In: Land Degradation and Desertifi cation — a Global Crisis (Ed. Kaswamila A.). Rij eka. P. 53—77. https://doi.org/10.5772/62403.

Svideniuk, M. O. (2021). Methodology for determining the physical parameters of ground plane by the results of the optical and radar data fusion. Ukrainian Journal of Remote Sensing, 8(3), 4—26 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.36023/ ujrs.2021.8.3.197.

Zaitseva, E., Stankevich, S., Kozlova, A., Piestova, I., Levashenko, V., Rusnak, P. (2021). Assessment of the risk of disturbance impact on primeval and managed forests based on Earth observation data using the example of Slovak Eastern Carpathians. IEEE Access, 9, 162847—162856. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3134375.

Sokolovska, A. V., Tomchenko, O. V. (2013). The study of anthropogenic changes in ecosystems on a basis of tools of GIS/ RS technologies using methods of system analysis. Problems of Continuous Geographic Education and Cartography, 17, 57—60 [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2024-09-02

How to Cite

URUSKYI, O., STANKEVICH, S., DUDAR, T., MOSOV, S., & PRYSIAZHNYI, V. (2024). Integrated Assessment of Disturbed Ecosystems Using Remote Sensing Technique. Science and Innovation, 20(5), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine20.05.003

Issue

Section

General Questions on Modern Scientific, Technical and Innovation Policy