Criminal and Criminal Proceeding Protection of Intellectual Property Rights

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/scine17.02.084

Keywords:

protection, intellectual property, criminal law, criminal proceedings, methods of protection, protection of rights, and offended party.

Abstract

Introduction. The right to the protection of intellectual property arises from its owner at the moment of breach or contestation of his rights and interests protected by law and is realized within the framework of civil, criminal, and administrative legal relations.
Problem Statement. While exercising the right to protect intellectual property in the field of criminal law and criminal proceedings, there arises the problem of guaranteeing individual rights.
Purpose. The purpose is study the guarantees of individual rights, which are realized in the course of protecting intellectual property rights in criminal proceedings.
Materials and methods. The research is based on the legislation of Ukraine and international legal acts; it involves methodological, dialectical, systemic, logical methods, as well as the method of comparative law.
Results. Identified guarantees to ensure the rights of the offended party of a criminal offense related to breach of intellectual property rights.
Conclusions. Specific guarantees for securing the rights of offended party whose intellectual property rights are infringed include as follows: 1) the offended party is entitle to file a statement of offense, to file a civil lawsuit for damage caused by a criminal offense, to make a conciliation agreement; 2) the exercise by the offended party of his right to file a statement of offense committed against him gives rise to a legal consequence that is the opening of criminal proceedings; 3) investigator/prosecutor shall record the relevant information to the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations, to initiate an investigation; the court shall handle a civil lawsuit, award judgment on it, and perform other responsibilities to secure the offended party's rights; 4) the criminal procedure law establishes responsibility for failure to fulfill obligations related to guaranteeing the rights and legitimate interests of parties of criminal proceedings.

Author Biography

Volodymyr Maryniv , Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

Maryniv Volodymyr Ivanovych - Associate Professor at the Department of Criminal Procedure, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Docent, Candidate of Law. Tel. 050 5650700. e-mail: maryniv@mail.ru. ORCID 0000-0002-4806-4105

References

Long, Doris, Ray, Patricia, Zharov, V. O., Sheveleva, T. M., Vasylenko, I. E., Drobiazko, V. S. (2007). Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Norms of International and National Legislation and Their Law Enforcement. A practical guide. Kyiv: “KIS”. 448 p.

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Voice of Ukraine. 2001. Iss. No.3.

The First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of March 20, 1952. Official Gazette of Ukraine.2006. Issue No.32. P. 453. Art. 2372.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case “Anheuser-BuschInc. v. Portugal” .URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-78981 (Last accessed: 14.11.2020).

Guide to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 — Protection of Property.URL: https://www.echr.com.ua/zaxist-vlasnosti-posibnikyespl-zi-st-1-protokolu-1-do-konvenci%D1%97-perekladeno-ukra%D1%97nskoyu/ (Last accessed: 14.11.2020).

The Criminal Code of Ukraine. Official Gazette of Ukraine. 2001. Iss. No.21. Page 1. Art. 920.

Dudorov, O .O., Khavroniuk, M. I. (2014). Criminal law: a Textbook / Under the general ed. of М.І. Khavroniuk. Kyiv: Vaite. 944 p.

Soviet Criminal Procedure: A Textbook. (1983). / Alpert, A. S., Bazhanov, M. I., Groshevoy, Yu. M., Didenko, M. P., Zelenetskiy, V. S., Mikheenko, M. M., Postovoi, D. A., Finko, V. D. Kyiv: Vyshcha Shkola, 1983. 439 p.

Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of July 3, 2019, court case № 288/1158/16-k. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/82998245 (Last accessed: 24.12.2020).

Starovoitov, A. A. Features of Proceedings on Private Prosecution Cases: (PhD). 12.00.09. Moscow, 2005. 149 p. [in Ukrainian].

Regulation on the Procedure for Conducting an Integrated Register of Pre-trial Investigation: Approved Order of the General Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine 06.04.2016 № 139. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/z0680-16 (Last accessed: 14.11.2020).

Criminal legislation of foreign countries (England, USA, France, Germany, Japan) (1999) / L.V. Golovko. Collection of Legislative Tools // Under the ed. of I.D. Kozochkin. Moscow. 352 p.

Butov, V. N. (1988). Criminal Procedure in Austria. Krasnoyarsk. 490 p.

Bobotov S. V. (1994). Justice in France. Moscow: without publishing house. 430 p.

Nor, V. T. Protection of Property Rights in Criminal Proceedings: monograph. Kyiv: “Vyshcha Shkola”, 1989. 275 p. [in Ukrainian].

On Court Fees: Law of Ukraine of 21.10.2019 № 2597-VIII. Holos Ukrainy (Voice of Ukraine). 2011. № 142. [in Ukrainian].

Demura M. I. (2019). Procedural State of the Offended party during the Pre-Trial Investigation: / M. I. Demura; [scient. ed. of V. I. Maryniv]. Kharkiv: Pravo. 224 p. [in Ukrainian].

Intellectual property infringement: civil procedure isn’t the only option. URL: https://bit.ly/2HG5kq4 (Last accessed: 14.11.2020).

Criminal defence and protection of intellectual property rights (experience of the United States of America, the United Kingdom of Great Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany and the Swiss Confederation). URL: http://euinfocenter.rada.gov.ua/uploads/documents/29443.pdf (Last accessed: 14.11.2020).

Downloads

Published

2021-04-27

How to Cite

Маринів, В. ., & Демура, М. (2021). Criminal and Criminal Proceeding Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. Science and Innovation, 17(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine17.02.084

Issue

Section

Legal Protection of Intellectual Property