disparities of regional development, catalysts and retarders of disparity indicators, fuzzy logic methods, fuzzification, regulation of disparities


Introduction. Regions of Ukraine are characterized by a considerable level of disparities in socio-economic development. Interpretation of disparities is important in order to develop the measures preventing their aggravation.

Problem Statement. The indices of regional disparities are variable and heterogeneous, with different dynamics. Thus, it is difficult to estimate them with the help of conventional methods that do not allow application of intermediate indices.

Purpose. To formulate a mechanism for regulating regional disparities necessary for further solution of management and prognostic tasks based on innovative approaches given environmental variability, rapid, and non-linear dynamics of disparities.

Materials and Methods. For estimation and interpretation of indices for regional disparities, it is advisable to use methods of fuzzy logic theory. These methods apply to quantitative estimation of qualitative information (in the case when it is indefinite), modeling of increasingly complicated economic processes given a high reliability of calculations based on fuzzy logic models.

Results. The mechanism for forecasting the dynamics of regional disparities by fuzzy logic methods has been presented as integration of interdependent factors ensuring development of the region under unstable conditions of external and internal environment. With the help of fuzzy logic methods, the membership function between the levels of disparities and the catalysts of disparities (retarders) has been built. The characteristics of regional disparity levels have been classified as permissible, regulated, and catastrophic. The study of dynamics of the disparity underlies elaborating public policy recommendations on the regulation of disparities.

Conclusions. The characteristics of disparities for each region estimated on the basis of membership function pave the way for further forecasting the dynamics of disparities and developing a strategy for the regulation of disparities in each region.


Klebanova, T. S., Trunova, T. N., Smirnova, A. Y. (2011). Algorithm for assessing and analyzing the disproportions in the levels of social and economic development of regions. Business Inform, 5(1), 34–38.

Svetunkov, S. G., Svetunkov, I. S., Kyzym, M. O., Klebanova, T. S. (2011). Forecasting the social and economic development of regions using models of a complex economy. The Problems of Economy, 2, 83–90.

McCann Ph. (2020). Perceptions of regional inequality and the geography of discontent: insights from the UK. Regional Studies, 2020, 54(2), 256–267.

Martinez-Galarraga, J., Roses, J. R., Tirado, D. A. (2015). The Long-Term Patterns of Regional Economic Inequality in Spain, Regional Studies, 49(4), 502–517. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.783692

Gur’yanova, L. S., Prokopovich, S. V. (2013). Models for assessing the impact of interregional interaction on the convergence of territorial development. Business Inform, 1, 62–68.

Martin, R. (2015). Rebalancing the Spatial Economy: the Challenge for Regional Theory. Territory, Politics, Governance, 3(3), 235-272.http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2015.1064825.

Storonianska, I. Z. (2006). Assessment of the asymmetry of social and economic development of Ukraine’s regions and substantiating of the priorities of public regional policy. Regional Economy, 4, 101–111.

Chagovets, L. A., Nikiforova, O. V. (2011). Assessment of the differentiation of social and economic activity of regional zones. Business Inform, 6, 31–34.

Klebanova, T. S., Trunova, T. N. (2009). Differentiation of Ukraine’s regions according to the level of social and economic development. Economy of Development, 1, 5–8.

Semianovskyi, V. M. (2011). Methods of social and economic forecasting. Kyiv.

Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1), 3–28.

Marushchak, S. M. (2011). Methods for assessing the level of economic security of the enterprise based on the theory of fuzzy sets. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University, 5(1), 16–21.

Zubko, T. L. (2016). Methods for determining the economic security of the enterprise. Economy. Management. Business, 2(16), 29–39.

Shtovba, S. D. (2001). Introduction to fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic. Vinnytsya, Vinnytsya State Technical University.

Ostankova, L. A., Shevchenko, N. Yu. (2010). Modeling of indicators of the enterprise’s economic security on the basis of fuzzy logic. Economy of Industry, 2, 106–110.

Matviichuk, A. V. (2011). Artificial intelligence in economics: neural networks, fuzzy logic. Kyiv.

Ivanchenko, N. O. (2016). Adaptive system of monitoring and management for economic security of the enterprise. Global and national economic problems, 9, 863–866.

Shevchenko, O. V. (2018). Methodical maintenance for estimation and analysis of regional disparities’ level in Ukraine. Black Sea Economic Studies, 36(2), 44–51.

Shevchenko, O. V. (2019). Mechanism for the definition of social and economic catalysts for the disparity of regional development based on instrumental analysis. University Economic Bulletin of the Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University, 42, 110–121.

Shevchenko, O. (2019). Models of reduction of interregional disparities accounting regional economic security. Conference proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International scientific-practical conference “Problems of Infocommunication: science and technology” (PIC S&T’2019), October 8-11, 2019, Kyiv, 193–196.

Zhuravlova, I. V. (2008). Application of fuzzy set theory to problems of management for intellectual consumer capital. Scientific Articles of DonNTU, 33(2), 126–131.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Shevchenko О. . (2021). ELABORATION OF A MECHANISM FOR REGULATING DISPARITIES OF REGIONAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BY FUZZY LOGIC METHODS. Science and Innovation, 17(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine17.01.018



General Questions on Modern Scientific, Technical and Innovation Policy