dynamic economic efficiency, economic analysis of law, human capital, innovative entrepreneurship, overcoming income inequality, law and digital economy, scientometric content of economic and legal institutions.


Introduction. Today, overcoming income inequality and poverty is the basis of sustainable development. Against the background of the actualization of innovations, the scientometric substantiation of the doctrinal role of the rule of law on the interdisciplinary basis of law and the economy of innovations as a rudder of equal access of actors to
economic chances is an essential component of the economic and legal platform of effective economic dynamics.
Problem Statement. The vector of research is the identification of modern key factors influencing the rule of
law on the economic levers of forming an economic and legal platform for effective economic dynamics and for
reducing income inequality.
Purpose. Economic and legal analysis of the concept of the rule of law, substantiation of its driving force for
effective economic dynamics and welfare growth.
Material and Methods. The basis of the research methodology is the anthropological axis of the research
discourse.Analytical, historical and method of retrospective analysis of scientometric theoretical works, forecasting, economic and legal analysis, empirical method.
Results. A vector for the development of an interdisciplinary economic and legal concept of promoting the rule of law for the effectiveness of economic dynamics in the information economy with a view to improving welfare by activating the quality of human capital has been initiated.
Conclusions. Scientific and theoretical dynamics of the conceptual basis of the rule of law on a cross-sectoral
basis of law and economics as a driver of equal access of actors to economic opportunities, innovation, entrepreneurship is an important component of effective economic and legal platform for the modern domestic development and the overcoming of inequality.


Download data is not yet available.


Sheptytsky, A. (2014). How to build a home? Ivano-Frankivsk: Discourses, 3.

Melnikov, A. G., Semenyuk, E. (2014). The information revolution and the modern printing industry. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 41(1), 19.

Baker, D., Jayadev, A., Stiglitz, J. Innovation, intellectual property, and development: A better set of approaches for the 21st century. URL: (Last accessed: 23.04.2022).

Chen, S., Ravallion, M. (2013). More relatively-poor people in a less absolutely-poor world. Review of Income and Wealth, 59(1), 1-28.

Gates, J. (2000). Democracy at Risk: Rescuing Main Street from Wall Street. Cambridge: erseus Publishing.

The World Bank Institute. (2000). "The Global Divide in Health, Education and Technology". Special Report. Washington: World Bank Institute.

Posner, R. A. (1998). Creating a Legal Framework for Economic Development. 13 The World Bank Research Observer 1 at 3.

Petrishin, O. V. (2015). Theory of State and Law. Kharkiv: Pravo.

Shutak, I. D., Onyshchuk, I. I. (2021). Comprehensive approach to perception of lawin context of doctrinal views. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(4), 42-50.

Averyanov, V. B. (2008). The principle of the rule of law: problems of theory andpractice: monograph: in 2 books. Кiev: NAS of Ukraine, Institute of State and Law.

Holovaty, S. (2006). The rule of law: monograph: In 3 books. Kyiv: Phoenix Publishing House.

Koziubra, M. I. (2010). Rule of Law: Ukrainian Realities and Prospects. Law ofUkraine, 3, 6-18.

Kozyubra, M. I. (2010, December). Conceptual foundations of the rule of law: history, theory, practice. Paper presented at the international scientific-practical conference "Rule of law: history, theory, practice", (22 December 2010, Kyiv). Kyiv, 3-10.

Petryshyn, O. V. (2010). Rule of law in the system of legal regulation of public relations. Law ofUkraine, 3, 24-35.

Tsvik, M. V., Petryshyn, O. V. (2009). General theory of state and law. Kharkiv: Pravo.

Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. (2008). Principle of the rule of law in the activities of the state and inadministrative law. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of State and Law. V. M. Koretsky. Kyiv: Conus-Yu.

Bingham, T. (2010). The Rule of Law. Allen Lane: Penguin Press.

Dicey, A., Loucaides, L. (1979/1885). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Cremona, J. (1999).The Rule of Law as a Fundamental Principle of the European Convention of Human Rights. A Council for all Seasons: 50 Anniversary of the Council of Europe. Valetta: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Malta).

Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197-222.

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American EconomicReview, 45(1), 1-28.

Lewis, A. (1955). The Theory of Economic Growth. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Melnyk, L. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution: Preconditions and contents. Actualproblems of economics, 9(183), 26-30.

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sandal, J-U. (2016). The New Social Class System. Role of Higher Education Institutions in Society: Challenges, Tendencies and Perspectives. ALYTUS COLLEGE, 1(5), 210-215.

Schumpeter, J. (1934). Theory of Economic Development. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Soros, G. (998). The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Open Society Endangered. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

Stiglitz, J. (2000). "Introduction". In The World Bank: Structure and Policies, ed. Christopher L. Gilbert and David Vines, 1-9. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment. London.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1952). Ten Great Economists: From Marx to Keynes. London: Allen & Unwin.

Hayek, F. A. (1972 /1944). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bentham, J. (1781/2000). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.

Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Citizens of Other States International Cen- ter for the Settlement of Investment Disputes. Washington. (1965, March). URL: default/files/ICSID%20Convention%20English.pdf (Last accessed: 23.04.2022).

Saez, E. (2017). Income and Wealth Inequality: Evidence and Policy Implications. Contemporary Economic Policy, 35(1), 7-28.

Nistotskaya, M., Cingolani, L. V. (2014). Bureaucratic Structure, Regulatory Quality and Entrepreneurship in a Comparative Perspective. Cross-Sectional and Panel Data Evidence Qo G. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 79.

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.

Nistotskaya, M., Charron, N., Lapuente, V. (2015). The wealth of regions: quality of government and SMEs in 172 European regions. Environment and Planning C: Governmentand Policy, 33(5), 1125-1155.

Haggard, S., MacIntyre, A., Tiede, L. (2008). The rule of law and economic development. A short review of political sciences, 11(1), 205-234.

Sereda, V. A. (2021). The Role of Law in Promoting the Efficiency of the Modern Economy (Theoretical approach). Sci. innov., 17, 62-71.

Knott, J., Miller, G. (2006). Social welfare, corruption and credibility: Public management's role in economic development. Public Management Review, 8, 227-252.

Miller, G., Hammond, T. (1994). Why politics is more fundamental than economics: Incentive-compatible mechanisms are not credible. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6, 5-26.

North, D. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton & Co.

North, D., Weingast, B. (1989). Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(04), 803.

Hagard, S., Tiede, L. B. (2011). The rule of law is that economic growth: de mi? Luminous development, 39(5), 673-685.

European Commission. (2002). Competition policy in Europe: the competition rules for supply and distribution agreements. Directorate-General for Competition: Publications Office.

European Commission. (2013). The competition rules for supply and distribution agreements: competition policy in Europe. Directorate-General for Competition: Publications Office.

Murphy, A. (2000). The 'Celtic Tiger' - An Analysis of Ireland's Economic Growth Performance. San Domenico (FI): Europ. Univ. Inst.

Brown, G. (2000). Lecture by the Chancellor of the Exchequer to the Royal Economic Society. London.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.

Harper, D. (1998). Institutional Conditions for Entrepreneurship. Advances in Austrian Economics, 5, 241-275.

Holcombe, R. (1998). Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(2), 45-62.

Scully, G. (1988). The Institutional Framework and Economic Development. Journal ofPolitical Economy, 96, 652-662.

Adler, A. (1997). Science to live. Kiev: Port Royal.

Durlauf, S., Kourtellos, A., Tan, C. (2008). "Are Any Growth Theories Robust?" Economic Journal, 118(527), 329-346.

Libanova, E., Makarova, O., Sarioglo, V. (2020). The policy of activation as an investment inhuman capital: theory and practice. Science innovation, 16(5), 57-68. (Last accessed: 23.04.2022).

Stiglitz, J. (2019, May). Public options are the key to restoring the middle-class life. URL: 42915ad4-6cc3-11e9-9ff9-8c855179f1c4. (Last accessed: 23.04.2022).

Bonoli, G. (2011). Active labour market policy and social investment: A changing relationship. Towards A Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol: Policy Press, 181-204.

Tokqueville, Alexis de. (2000). Democracy in America. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress




How to Cite




General Questions on Modern Scientific, Technical and Innovation Policy