The Corporate Form of Innovating Entities in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/scine18.05.095Keywords:
innovation, technology park, science park,, legal entity, intellectual property rightsAbstract
Introduction. High risk associated with innovation requires reducing possible losses during the implementation
of innovation as much as possible. The form of a legal entity is a means of achieving this goal. It allows separating
the obligations of legal entity from those of its members.
Problem Statement. The legislation of Ukraine and foreign states contains numerous forms of legal entities in the sphere of innovation. Therefore, it is necessary to systematize them.
Purpose. The purpose of this research is to from a single vector of systemic legal regulation of legal entities in the field of innovation based on the analysis of domestic and foreign doctrine and legislation.
Material and Methods. In the process of research, a complex of general scientific and special methods has
been used. Materials for the study are the publications of domestic and foreign researchers, the applicable legislation of Ukraine and foreign countries.
Results. The comparative analysis of the doctrine and practice of foreign states has shown dispositive approaches of legislation of different states to the differences between the science parks and the technology parks and their
ties with R&D or educational institutions in them. However, the systemic legal regulation of such legal entities needs
the application of their common concept that will be the basis for unified approaches to this problem.
Conclusions. Public interest essentially influences the studied legal entities and defines their exclusive legal
capacity; special procedure for their creation; special status of innovating entity; special requirements to the
structure of founders; specific features of contributions to the authorized capital; the requirement of the presence
of innovation project.
Downloads
References
Draft Law of Ukraine "On support and development of innovation activity": public discussion. MON of Ukraine. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/news/gromadske-obgovorennya-zakonoproyekt-shodo-pidtrimki-ta-rozvitku-innovacijnoyidiyalnosti. (Last accessed: 19.11.2021) [in Ukrainian].
Kravchuk, V. M. (2005). Corporate law. Scientific and practical commentary of legislation and judicial practice. Кyiv: Іstyna [in Ukrainian].
Kurbatov, A. Y. (2009). Legal personality of credit organizations: theoretical foundations of formation and problems of implementation. Abstracts of thesis Doctor's dissertation. Moscow: Higher School of Economics [in Russian].
Кucherenko, І. М. (2004). Legal forms of legal entities of private law: a monograph. Кyiv: Institute of State and Law named after V. M. Koretskyi of NAN of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Shovkaliuk, V. S. (2010). Science parks: Ukrainian realities and world experience. Problematic issues in the creation and activities of science parks in Ukraine. 4 March 2010. URL: http://eep.org.ua/files/2010.pdf (Last accessed: 10.02.2016) [in Ukrainian].
Spasybo-Fatieieva, I. V. (2010). The latest trends in rethinking the essence of a legal entity. (Ed. А. H. Didenko). Civil Legislation: selections, 4 (31-35), 20-41 [in Russian].
Hlibko, S. V., Heorhiievskyi, Yu. V., Rozghon, O. V. (2020). Subjects of private legal relations of technology transfer: status and activity / Legal support of the National innovation system in modern conditions: a monograph (Eds. S. V. Hlibko, О. V. Rozghon). Kharkiv: Scientific and Research Institute of Providing Legal Framework for the Innovative Development of NALS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Zelisko, А. V. (2010). Legal status of science parks as legal entities of private law. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 7, 89-93 [in Ukrainian].
Venediktova, I. V. (2012). A legally protected interest in civil law: a monograph. Kharkiv: Tochka [in Russian].
Kashchuk, K. M. (2012). Practical aspects of creating a science park on the basis of a higher education institution. Strategic directions and priorities of formation of competitiveness of agrarian sector : materials of conference of young scientistseconomists, (10-11 March, Kyiv). 25-27 [in Ukrainian].
Ng, W. K. B., Appel-Meulenbroek, H. A. J. A., Cloodt, M. M. A. H., Arentze, T. A. (2019). Towards a segmentation of science parks: a typology study on science parks in Europe. Res. Policy, 48(3), 719-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.004
Yehorov, I. Y. (2018). Formation of state scientific-technical and innovation policy on the basis of the expanded model of "triple helix" (state-science-industry) (brief information about the project). Science and innovation, 14(1), 86-89 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine14.01.076
Dzisah, J., Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple helix circulation: the heart of innovation and development. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 7(2), 101-115.
https://doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.7.2.101_1
Durão, D., Sarmento, M., Varela, V., Maltez, L. (2005). Virtual and real-estate science and technology parks: A case study of Taguspark. Technovation, 25(3), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00110-X
Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., Gianiodis, P. T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003
What is Cambridge Science Park? URL: https://www.bidwells.co.uk/what-we-think/what-is-cambridge-science-park/ (Last accessed: 19.11.2021).
Mc Carthy, Ian P., Silvestre, Bruno S., von Nordenflycht, A., Breznitz, Shiri M. (2018). A typology of university research park strategies: What parks do and why it matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47, 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.01.004
Tengwei Wang, Yuefang Si. (2019). Establishing Science and Technology Parks: A Reference Guidebook for Policymakers in Asia and the Pacific. United Nations Publication. URL:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339713151_Establishing_Science_and_Technology_Parks_A_Reference_Guidebook_for_Policymakers_in_Asia_and_the_Pacific (Last accessed: 19.11.2021).
Lago Cotrim Henriques, Vinicius Amorim, Sobreiro Herbert Kimura. (2018). Science and technology park: Future challenges. Technology in Society, 53, 144-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.01.009
Douglas S. Salvador, SusanaToboso-Chavero, Ana Nadal, Xavier Gabarrell, Joan Rieradevall, Ricardo S.da Silva. (2019). Potential of technology parks to implement Roof Mosaic in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.214
Oh Deog-Seong, Yeom Insup. (2012). Daedeok Innopolis in Korea: From Science Park to Innovation Cluster. World Technopolis Review, 1(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2012.1.2.141
Mr. David Rowe. (2013). Setting up, managing and evaluating eu science and technology parks. An advice and guidance report on good practice. Regional and Urban Policy. European Commission. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/ sources/docgener/studies/pdf/stp_report_en.pdf. (Last accessed: 19.11.2021).
Ng, W. K. B., Appel-Meulenbroek, H. A. J. A., Cloodt, M. M. A. H., Arentze, T. A. (2021). Perceptual measures of science parks: Tenant firms' associations between science park attributes and benefits. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120408
