Reforms of Social Security Contributions in Selected EU Member States and Ukraine: Peculiarities of Implementation and Consequences




tax burden on labor, the labour taxes incidence, reforms of the social security contributions, sources of financing social expenditures, neoliberal strategies


Introduction. The need to improve the situation in labor markets and to intensify the entrepreneurial activity prompts to reduce tax burden on labor by revising the rates of social security contributions in most EU countries.
In Ukraine, the main goal of the corresponding reform in 2016 was to reduce informal employment and income.
Problem Statement. Neoliberal strategies for reforming social security contributions and transforming social security systems have been spreading over some EU countries and Ukraine, which may result in deteriorating economic growth and increasing inequality and poverty.
Purpose. The purpose of this research is to substantiate possible social and economic risks of introducing radical proposals on the single social contribution reform and to define the expediency of their realization in Ukraine.
Materials and Methods. The European Commission methodology for calculation of the implicit rate of labor taxes in Ukraine, methods of the comparative analysis of social security contributions reform in Ukraine and the EU countries; theoretical generalization of the reasons for the spread of neoliberal strategies; factual and statistical analysis have been used in the research.
Results. The peculiarities and common features of reforming social security contributions in Ukraine and postsocia list EU countries with the largest scale of their reduction have been defined. It has been proven that the critical perception of the SSC reform in 2016 in Ukraine is largely related to the establishment of a contribution exclusively for employers. The fiscal, economic, and social aspects of the reform processes and possible risks of implementation of proposals on the abolition of SSC in Ukraine have been substantiated.
Conclusions. The most obvious consequences of the abolition of SSC in Ukraine may be a decrease in the welfare of workers and retirees and aggravation of inequality and poverty. It is not implausible that the expected results might be contradictory or uncertain. Although the short-term forecast is likely to increase the rates of economic growth, in the long run, there is a significant threat of degradation of its quality.


Download data is not yet available.


European Commission. (2020, February). Data on Taxation. URL: economic-analysis-taxation/data-taxation_en (Last accessed: 09.01.2021).

Tax Wedge on Labour: Shifting Tax Burden from Labour to Other Forms of Taxation. (2020). Technical note for the Eurogroup. URL: (Last accessed: 04.01.2021).

KPMG. (2020). Tax Rates Online: social security rates. URL: (Last accessed: 04.01.2021).

Barr, N. (1992). Economic Theory and the Welfare State: a Survey and Interpretation. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(2). URL: (Last accessed: 04.01.2021).

Goudswaard, K., Caminada, K. (2015). Social security contributions: Economic and public finance considerations. International Social Security Review, 68(4), 25-45. URL: (Last accessed: 04.01.2021).

Melguizo, Á., González-Páramo, J. M. (2013). Who bears labour taxes and social contributions? A meta-analysis approach. SERIEs, 4(3), 247-271.

Study on the effects and incidence of labour taxation. (2015). Final report. (Taxation paper no. 56; written by CPB in consortium with: CAPP, CASE, CEPII, ETLA, IFO, IFS). Brussels: European Commission. 10.2778/ 88441.

Alesina, A., Perotti, R. (1994). The welfare state and competitiveness. NBER Working Paper, 4810. 10.3386/w4810.

Ooghe, E., Schokkaert, E., Flechet, J. (2003). The incidence of social security contributions: an empirical analysis. Empirica, 30(2).

Saez, E., Slemrod, J., Giertz, S. H. (2009). The Elasticity of Taxable Income with Respect to Marginal Tax Rates: a Critical Review. NBER Working Paper, 15012. URL: pdf (Last accessed: 09.01.2021).

Financing social protection for the future of work: Fiscal aspects and policy options. (2018, May). ILO Report prepared for the G20 Framework Working Group. URL: (Last accessed: 09.01.2021).

Financing Labour Tax Wedge Cuts. (2017). Technical services note to the Eurogroup. URL: https://www.consilium. (Last accessed: 09.01.2021).

State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n. d.). Informal employment of the population by type of economic activity. URL: (Last accessed: 05.01.2021)

Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. (2019). Shadow Economies in Ukraine. Results of the 2019 Survey. Research сonducted under H2020 Project SHADOW, financed by the European Commission (GA no. 778188). URL: http://kiis. (Last accessed: 05.01.2021) [in Ukrainian).

Schneider, F., Buehn, A. (2016). Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy: Methods, Problems and Open Questions. IZA Discussion Paper, 9820. URL: (Last accessed: 05.01.2021).

Navickas, M., Juščius, V., Navickas, V. (2019). Determinants of Shadow Economy in Eastern European Countries. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 66(1), 1-14. URL: (Last accessed: 05.01.2021).

Igudia, E., Ackrill, R., Coleman, S., Dobson, C. (2016). Determinants of the informal economy of an emerging economy: a multiple indicator, multiple causes approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 28(2/3), 154-177.

Schneider, F., Enste, D. (2000). Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77-114.

Friedman, E., Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., Zoido-Labton, P. (2000). Dodging the Grabbing Hand: The Determinants of Unofficial Activity in 69 Countries. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 459-493. (99)00093-6.

Schneider, F. (2009). Size and Development of the Shadow Economy in Germany, Austria and Other OECD-Countries: Some Preliminary Findings. Revue économique, 60(5), 1079-1116.

Koval, O. (2019). Libertarian and social insurance in Ukraine. Strategic prioritets, 1, 102-109. URL: R=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=spa_2019_1_13 (Last accessed: 13.04.2021) [in Ukrainian].

Serebrianskyi, D., Vdovychenko, A. (2016). SSC and de-shadowing: a false start or the beginning of structural change? Mirror Weekly, 20. June 4 - June 16. URL: (Last accessed: 09.01.2021) [in Ukrainian].

Trade Union of Education and Science Workers of Ukraine. (2019). Consolidated information on indicators of the Single Contribution to Compulsory State Social Insurance for 2015-2019. URL: (Last accessed: 09.01.2021) [in Ukrainian].

The State Treasury Service of Ukraine (n.d.). Expenditures by economic classification of budget expenditures. Section II.3 of Report on the Execution of the State Budget of Ukraine. URL: vikonannya-derzhavnogo-byudzhetu (Last accessed: 09.01.2021) [in Ukrainian].

Ministry for Development of Economy, Trade and Agriculture of Ukraine. (2019). Labor market review in Ukraine (III quarter of 2019). Wages and salaries. URL: (Last accessed: 09.01.2021) [in Ukrainian].

Zahariev, B. (2019). ESPN Thematic Report on Financing social protection - Bulgaria. European Social Policy Network (ESPN), Brussels: European Commission. URL: (Last accessed: 11.01.2021).

Eurostat. (n.d.). Social protection Database: Social protection receipts by type. URL: web/social-protection/data/database (Last accessed: 11.01.2021).

Kelmanson, В., Kirabaeva, K., Medina, L., Mircheva, B., Weiss, J. (2019). Explaining the shadow economy in Europe: size, causes and policy options. IMF Working Paper, 278. URL: WP/2019/wpiea2019278-print-pdf.ashx (Last accessed: 11.01.2021).

Balcerowicz, W., Maftei, А., Varga, J. (2019). Labour Taxation in Romania: Revised, but not changed. Economic Brief, 050. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission.

Anciūtė, A., Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė, V., Maftei, A., Varga, J. (2020). Labour Tax and Child Benefits Reform in Lithuania: For Better or Worse? Economic Brief, 059. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission.

Dausėnaitė, E. (2019). Salary calculation changes from 2019. Lithuania. URL: (Last accessed: 11.01.2021).

Egri, D. (2020). Changes to payroll taxes as of 1 July 2020. Hungary. URL: (Last accessed: 20.01.2021).

Saez, E., Schoefer, B., Seim, D. (2017, November 22). The effects of employer payroll tax cuts on employment, business activity and wages. URL: (Last accessed: 5.01.2021).

European Commission. (2021, February). European Economic Forecast. Winter 2021 (Interim). Institutional Paper, 144. URL: (Last accessed: 11.01.2021).

The Union of Ukrainian Entrepreneurs. (2020, June 02). Gradual reduction of SSC to 10%: why it was included to the package of priority economic reforms. URL: (Last accessed: 5.01.2021) [in Ukrainian].

Getmantsev, D. (2020, January 8). Single social contribution, personal income tax and military levy must be combined. URL: (Last accessed: 5.01.2021) [in Ukrainian].

Mykhaylenko, D. (2020). Taxation of salaries and business income. Mirror Weekly, 1284. February 28 - March 6. URL: (Last accessed: 5.01.2021) [in Ukrainian].

Dubrovsky, V. (2019). Taxes that will allow development. Mirror Weekly, 24. June, 22-25. URL: (Last accessed: 5.01.2021) [in Ukrainian].

Wagner, N. (2011). Financing social security in the EU: Business as usual? ETUI Working Paper, 09. 10.2139/ssrn.2221817.

OECD. (2018, July). Tax policies for inclusive growth in a changing world. Report to G-20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. URL: pdf (Last accessed: 12.01.2021).

CESifo. (2008). Bismarck versus Beveridge: a Comparison of Social Insurance Systems in Europe. CESifo DICE Report, 4, 69-71. URL: (Last accessed: 12.01.2021).

Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2000). Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Fiscal Crisis of the Welfare State. Harvard Law Review, 113(7), 1573-1676. URL: (Last accessed: 9.01.2021).

Fischer, R. (2020, June 26). Average Monthly Salary in European Union 2020. URL: ave rage-monthly-salary-european-union-2020 (Last accessed: 16.01.2021).

Kvist, J. (2019). ESPN Thematic Report on Financing social protection - Denmark. European Social Policy Network (ESPN), Brussels: European Commission. URL: (Last accessed: 16.01.2021).

OECD. (2019). Pension Markets in Focus 2019. OECD Publishing. URL: (Last accessed: 5.01.2021).

SSA. (2018). Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Europe, 2018. SSA Publication, 13-11801. 386 р. URL: (Last accessed: 16.01.2021).

Nyasha, S., Odhiambo, N. M. (2019). Government Size and Economic Growth: A Review of International Literature. SAGE Open, 9(3). (Last accessed: 5.01.2021).

National Statistics Office of Georgia. (n.d.). Foreign Direct Investments in Georgia: 1996-2020, Mil. USD. URL: (Last accessed: 15.01.2021).

Malová, D. A. (2004). Neoliberal Trojan Horse? The New EU Member States and EU Social Model. Meeting Report, 309. URL: (Last accessed: 18.01.2021).

Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation. (2019). Reforms in Ukraine: public opinion. A nationwide survey, conducted in cooperation with the Razumkov Center Sociological Service on December 6-11, 2019. URL: https://dif. (Last accessed: 3.01.2021) [in Ukrainian].




How to Cite

Iefymenko Т., Sokolovska А., & Rainova Л. (2021). Reforms of Social Security Contributions in Selected EU Member States and Ukraine: Peculiarities of Implementation and Consequences. Science and Innovation, 17(6), 24–40.



General Questions on Modern Scientific, Technical and Innovation Policy