digital technologies, digitalization of an economy, industry, sustainable development, ecological footprint, environmental performance.


Introduction. The processes of digitalization of an economy, associated with the deployment of technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, are multifaceted and have a significant impact, including on the environment, which affects the interests of future generations.
Problem Statement. Acceleration of digitalization is accompanied by contradictory positive and negative effects on the environment. In this regard, the identification of these effects at both the global and national levels is an urgent problem.
Purpose. The purpose is to identify the relationship between the digital and green economy and to substantiate ways of environmentally safe development of digital technologies in Ukraine.
Materials and Methods. Clustering of world countries on the basis of economic, industrial, and digital development; econometric analysis of the relationships between the ICT development index and the environmental performance index in the world countries and their groups (clusters) for 2017—2020.
Results. It has been established that at the global level, the introduction of state-of-the-art digital technologies
has a generally positive relationship with the state of environment: the higher the level of digitalization, the more environment friendly national economies, other things being equal. It has been found that the environmental performance of digitalization depends on the level of manufacturing (tangible) technologies and the overall economic development. In the clusters of less developed coun-tries, including Ukraine that has significant problems in industry and innovation, the spread of digital technologies has less positive impact on the environment than in the
clusters of more advanced econ-omies. Therefore, the long-term positive effects of digitalization for Ukraine are
not obvious, while the negative ones may have serious negative consequences.

Conclusions. To minimize the environmental risks of digitalization processes in Ukraine, it is necessary to develop a national academic program for comprehensive assessment of effects of various aspects (abiotic, biotic, anthropogenic) of digital technologies on environment, as well as to harmonize economic digitalization programs with the overall strategy for innovation-driven national manufacture.


European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A New Industrial Strategy for Europe. Brussels, 10.3.2020. COM (2020) 102 final. 16 p.

European Commission. (2020). Supporting the green transition: shaping Europe's digital future. URL: https://ec.europa. eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/shaping-europe-digital-future_en (Last accessed: 10.10.2020).

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (2018). Research result GCI 2018. URL: gci2018rus/ (Last accessed: 10.10.2020) [in Russian].

World Economic Forum. (2019). A New Circular Vision for Electronics: Time for a Global Reboot. 24 p.

Sivani, S., Sudarsanam, D. (2013). Impacts of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) from cell phone towers and wireless devices on biosystem and ecosystem — a review. Biology and Medicine, 4(4), 202—216.

European Commission. (2019). A European Green Deal. URL: european-green-deal_en (Last accessed: 10.10.2020).

Curran, C. (2020). What Will 5G Mean for the Environment? The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies, University of Washington. URL: (Last accessed: 10.10.2020).

Cisco Mobile VNI. (2019). Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2017—2022. White Paper Cisco Mobile.

Andrae, A. S. G., Edler, A. T. (2015). On global electricity usage of communication technology: trends to 2030. Challenges, 6, 117—157.

Ferreboeuf, H. (2019). Lean ICT: towards digital sobriety. Report. Agence française de développement, Caisse des Dépôts. 90 p. URL: pdf (Last accessed: 10.10.2020).

Global eSustainability Initiative. (2008). SMART 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age. A report by The Climate Group on behalf of the Global eSustainability Initiative (GeSI).

Global eSustainability Initiative. (2012). Smarter 2020: The Role of ICT in Driving a Sustainable Future. A Report by Boston Consulting Group on Behalf of GeSI.

Malmodin, J., Bergmark, P., Lunden, D. (2013). The future carbon footprint of the ICT and E&M sectors. In Proceedings of the ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S), Zurich, Switzerland.

Malmodin, J., Lunden, D. (2018). The Energy and Carbon Footprint of the Global ICT and E&M Sectors 2010—2015. Sustainability, 10(3027), 31. doi:10.3390/su10093027

Malmodin, J., Moberg, Å., Lunden, D., Finnveden, G., Lövehagen, N. (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions and operational electricity use in the ICT and entertainment & media sectors. J. Ind. Ecol., 14(5), 770—790.

Belkhir, L., Elmeligi, A. (2018). Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 & recommendations. J. Clean. Prod., 177, 448—463.

International Telecommunication Union. (2020). The ICT Development Index (IDI): conceptual framework and methodology. URL: (Last accessed: 06.11.2020).

Wendling, Z. A., Emerson, J. W., de Sherbinin, A., Esty, D. C., et al. (2020). 2020 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. URL: (Last accessed: 10.10.2020).

Vishnevsky, V. P., Harkushenko, O. M., Kniaziev, S. I. (2020). Technology Gaps: the Concept, Models, and Ways of Overcoming. Sci. innov., 16(2), 3—19. [in Ukrainian].

World Bank (2020). Databank. Worldbank. URL: (Last accessed: 18.05.2020).

Kucher, A., Kucher, L. (2017). Mineral fertilizers use in agriculture. Propozitsiya, 23.01.2017. URL: https://propozitsiya. com/ekonomika-ispolzovaniya-mineralnyh-udobreniy-v-selskom-hozyaystve (Last accessed: 02.11.2020) [in Russian].

Vishnevsky, V. P., Knjazev, S. I. (2018). How to Increase the Readiness of Ukraine’s Industry to Smart Transformations. Sci. innov., 14(4), 55—69. [in Ukrainian].

Garkushenko, O., Zanizdra, M. (2020). Green ICTs: potential and priorities for sustainable development. Analytical review. Econ. promisl., 3(91), 47—81. doi:

The World Bank (2020). World Bank Country and Lending Groups. URL: (Last accessed: 10.10.2020).

Kulakova, T. A., Koverzneva, S. A. (2016). The prospects of the BRICS new development institutions. International research journal, 1(43), 4, 100—102. doi: 10.18454/IRJ.2016.43.105 [in Russian].

International Telecommunication Union. (2017). ICT Development Index 2017. URL: (Last accessed: 10.10.2020).

European Commission. (2018). Public Private Partnerships — Shaping Europe’s digital future. URL: https://ec.europa. eu/digital-single-market/en/public-private-partnerships (Last accessed: 06.11.2020).

Nabi, E. (2020). They want debate and truth: mayors of major French cities opposed 5G. Tekhno 24. URL: (Last accessed: 01.11.2020) [in Ukrainian].

World Wildlife Fund. (2020). Living Planet Report 2020 — Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Almond, R. E. A., Grooten, M. and Petersen, T. (Eds). 2020. Gland, Switzerland: WWF. 164 p.

World Economic Forum. (2019). A New Circular Vision for Electronics: Time for a Global Reboot. World Economic Forum. 24 р.




How to Cite

Vishnevsky В., Harkushenko О. . ., Zanizdra М. . ., & Kniaziev С. . . (2021). DIGITAL AND GREEN ECONOMY: COMMON GROUNDS AND CONTRADICTIONS. Science and Innovation, 17(3), 14–27.



General Questions on Modern Scientific, Technical and Innovation Policy