Mobile Housing for Recreational use in Post-industrial Prydniprovia

Introduction. In the post-industrial period of the society development, under the conditions of economic globalization and a high social mobility, the use of mobile housing is a relevant and promising direction.
Problem Statement. In the socio-economic conditions of modern Ukraine, the practical and advantageous mobile residential technologies have great prospects for the development, especially through organizing recreational and tourist activities.
Purpose. To study the opportunities for using recreational and tourist mobile housing in the the existing natural-landscape fund of the post-industrial Prydniprovia.
Materials and Methods. An integrated methodological approach, general scientific and applied methods, including, bibliographic and comparative historical methods (archived local historical heritage, modern scholarly research publications and regulatory documentation), field surveys and photographing, experimental modeling.
Results. In the natural-landscape zone of post-industrial Prydniprovia region, there are many lands disturbed by man-induced load. However, in the case of its termination or significant reduction, the ecological state of the environment can be optimized. Design solutions for the organization of temporary mobile housing for recreation in the structure of potential natural-landscape fund of the region have been offered.
Conclusions. The use of recreational and tourist mobile housing in safe green landscapes seems to be an expedient and promising functional typological direction, because the organization of recreational housing in the mobile form is based on an environment friendly approach that aims at maximally reducing the man-induced load and preserving the natural environment.

1. Hvyilya, I. K. (1994). Osobennosti formirovaniya mobilnogo rekreatsionnogo zhilischa (MRZh) dlya usloviy Ukrainyi: avtoref. dis. kand. arh. Moskva. 20 s. [in Russian].
2. Panfilov, A. V. (2013). Osobennosti formirovaniya mobilnogo zhilischa dlya vremennogo prebyivaniya (konets XX – nachalo XXI v.): avtoref. dis. kand. arh. Moskva. 22 s. [in Russian].
3. Ekonomov, I. S. (2004). Printsipyi formirovaniya maloetazhnyih zhilyih ob'ektov na vode: avtoref. dis. kand. arh. Moskva. 36 s. [in Russian].
4. Pomorov, S. B. (2005). Vtoroe zhilische gorozhan kompensatsionnogo tipa: avtoref. dis. d. arh. Moskva. 25 s. [in Russian].
5. Timantseva, N. L. (2010). Printsipyi modelirovaniya zhiloy sredyi v ekstremalnyih usloviyah obitaniya: avtoref. dis. kand. arh. Moskva. 21 s. [in Russian].
6. Blinov, Yu. I. (1991). Tentovyie zdaniya i sooruzheniya (aspektyi myagkih pokryitiy i perspektiv razvitiya): avtoref. dis. d. tehn. nauk. Moskva. 48 s. [in Russian].
7. Terenozhkin, A. I. (1951). Kurgan Storozhova Mogila. ArheologIya, t. 5. Kyiv. P. 239-241 s. [in Russian].
8. Bessonova, S. S. (1982). O skifskih povozkah. Drevnosti stepnoy Skifii. Kyiv. S. 102-117. [in Russian].
9. Pletneva, S. A. (1982). Kochevniki srednevekovya. Moskva. 186 s. [in Russian].
10. Evarnitskiy, D. I. (1904). Doklad professora Evarnitskogo o proizvedennyih im raskopkah kurganov i istoricheskih izsledovaniyah. Ekaterinoslav. 25 s. [in Russian].
11. DSTU B V.2.2–22:2008 NatsIonalniy standart Ukrayinyi «Budinki mobIlnI (InventarnI). ZagalnI tehnIchnI umovi». Kyiv, 2009. 14 s. [in Ukrainian].
12. Slonevskiy, A. (2009). Ignatiy Yasyukovich. Imya v istorii. Dnepropetrovsk. 219 s. [in Russian].
13. Akinfiev, Iv. Yak. (1889). Rastitelnost Ekaterinoslava v kontse pervogo stoletiya ego suschestvovaniya. Ch. 1. Ekaterinoslav. 238 s. [in Russian].
14. Kernichnaya, E. A., Starostin, V. S. (2002). Retrospektivnyiy analiz landshaftno-planirovochnyih osobennostey osvoeniya territorii Dnepropetrovska. Visnik Dnipropetrovskogo unIversitetu. GeologIya. GeografIya. Vip. 4. Dnipropetrovsk, 2002. 145 – 150. [in Russian].
15. Pasichniy, G. V., Serdyuk, S. M. (2002). Geoekologichni monitoringovi doslidzhennya vmistu vazhkih metaliv u gruntah tehnogenno zminenih landshaftiv  na prikladI m. Dniprodzerzhinska) Visnik Dnipropetrovskogo universitetu. Geologiya. Geografiya. Vip. 4. Dnipropetrovsk. S. 161-166. [in Russian].
16. Ekologiya megapolisa. Ekologicheskie aspektyi promyishlennogo razvitiya Dnepropetrovska. (2002). Pod obschey redaktsiey Kulichenko I. I. Dnepropetrovsk. 368 s. [in Russian].
17. Pavlov, V. O., Peremetchik, M. M., Kolotenko, V. P., Shevchenko, B. E. (2000). Ekologichniy pasport mista Dnipropetrovska. Dnipropetrovsk. 112 s. [in Ukrainian].
18. Manyuk Vadim, Manyuk Volodimir. (2011). Pam’yatki prirodi Dnipropetrovskoyi oblasti. Dnipropetrovsk. 60 s. [in Ukrainian].
19. Panchenko, A. F., Nechiporenko, L. G., Zhaldak, D. N. (2011). Privedenie territorii hvostohranilischa «Suhachevskoe-1» v ekologicheski bezopasnoe sostoyanie. Tehniko-ekonomicheskoe obosnovanie. Tom 2. Otsenka vozdeystviya na okruzhayuschuyu sredu Dneprodzerzhinsk. 241 s. [in Russian].
20. Shmatkov, G. G., Serebryanaya, M. Z., Anischenko, O. L. (2002). Otsenka rasprostraneniya tyazhelyih metallov ot hvostohranilischa othodov pererabotki uranovih rud. Visnik Dnipropetrovskogo universitetu. Geologiya. Geografiya. Vip. 4. Dnipropetrovsk. 64–70. [in Russian].
21. Miroshnichenko, A. A. (1998). Agrarno-rekreatsionnyie zonyi v Ukraine. Dnepropetrovsk. 178 s. [in Russian].