Analysis of Patent Activity in R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine

1Pyatchanina, TV  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7992-995X
1Ogorodnik, AM  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7756-7222
2Vasilyev, OV
1Mazur, MG  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-8670
1RE Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology, NAS of Ukraine
2Informatio LTD, Ukraine
Sci. innov. 2019, 15(3):53-61
https://doi.org/10.15407/scine15.03.053
Section: Legal Protection of Intellectual Property
Language: English
Abstract: 
Introduction. The effectiveness of innovation activities of R&D oncology institutions is determined by the level of legal protection of intellectual property and affects the degree of implementation of research results in health care practice.
Problem Statement. Combatting cancer is one of the most important medical and social problems of our time and progress in solving it can be achieved through the use of fundamental knowledge as a significant source of innovation.
Purpose. To assess the status of patent and inventory activities of the RE Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (IEPOR) in terms of the formation of strategic management decisions concerning its optimization.Materials and Methods. The main quantitative indicators of patent and invention activities of the IEPOR for 2009-2017, in particular, the number of applications and the number of patents issued; the index of patents of various types (for inventions, utility models, industrial designs) obtained; and rating of patent activities by the IEPOR departments have been evaluated. On the basis of the quantitative analysis and analysis of the international patent classification (IPC) of IPR objects, the orientation of the IPR objects by themes and subjects has been studied.
Results. The peaks of patent activities were reported for 2010 (13 objects of IPR), 2013 (17 objects of IPR), and 2016 (12 objects of IPR). Data analysis for 2009-2017 on the received patent documents of various types has shown the priority of declarative patents for utility model. The patenting rating for 2009-2017 by the IEPOR research departments shows a different level of patent activities of researchers. A characteristic feature of the development of patent and inventory activities of researchers is the thematic orientation of the objects of IPs in full accordance with the main directions of the research work of the institute.
Conclusions. The indicators of patent activities show a high level of the scholarly research activities and innovative potential of the institute and are an informative basis for the formation of strategic management decisions regarding the optimization of patent and invention activities.
Keywords: experimental oncology, information support, innovative potential, invention activity, objects of intellectual property rights, patent activity
References: 
1. Androschuk, V. K., Fedulova, L. I., Haustov, G. O. (2011). Intelektualna vlasnist u natsionalniy Innovatsiyniy sistemu. In-t ekonomiki ta prognozuvannya NAN Ukrayini, 10, 201–216 [in Ukrainian].
2. Artamonova, N. O., Gorban, A. E., Kulinich, G. V. (2015). Naukometrichniy analiz zasobiv naukovih komunskatsiy v onkologiyi. Ukrayinskiy radiologichniy zhurnal, 1, 68–72 [in Ukrainian].
3. Egorov, I. Y. (2006). Nauka i innovatsii v protsessah sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kiev [in Ukrainian].
4. Zakrutko, L. I., Bilan, L. G., Ilnitska, L. V. (2018). Monitoring osnovnih zasobiv innovatsiynogo zabezpechennya u sferi ohoroni zdorov’ya Ukrayini u 2017 r. Visnyk sotsialnoi hihiieny ta orhanizatsii okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
5. Mizhnarodna patentna klasifikatsiya. 
URL: http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/ru/ (Last accessed: 01.07.2018) [in Ukrainian].
6. Oganov, R. G., Truschelev, S. A. (2012). Naukometricheskie podhodyi k analizu rezultatov nauchno-issledovatelskoy deyatelnosti. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika, 11(2), 90–99 [in Ukrainian].
7. Lazorishinets, V. V., Volosovets, A. P., Kochet, O. M. (2014). Pitannya pidvischennya efektivnosti innovatsiynoyi ta vinahidnitskoyi diyalnosti y rozvitku transferu medichnih tehnologiy u sferi ohoroni zdorov’ya Ukraiini. Ukr. med. сhasopis, 4, 142–145 [in Ukrainian].
8. Pro ohoronu prav na vinahodi ta korisni modeli: Zakon Ukrayini vid 15.12.1993 №3687- Х11. Vidomosti Verhovnoyi Radi Ukrayini, 7, 32 [in Ukrainian].
9. Kasumov, F., Gasanova, N. (2015). Metodika otsenki nauchnyih innovatsiy. Prikladnaya ekonomika, 2, 47–50 [in Ukrainian].
10. Kossko, T. G., Pavlino, T. M. (2014). Patentni doslidzhennya, yih aktualnist na shlyahu innovatsiynogo rozvitku. Nauka ta innov., 10(1), 67 [in Ukrainian].
11. Chehun, V. O., Kot, O. V. (2012). Patentuvannya vinahodiv v Ukrayini ta sviti tendentsiyi ta osoblivosti. Problemi nauki, 3, 12–19 [in Ukrainian].
12. Chehun, V. F., Shepelenko, I. V., Pyatchanina, T. V. (2012, November). Suchasniy stan i perspektivi transferu innovatsiynih tehnologiy v onkologiyi v Ukrayini. III Mizhnarodniy forum «Problemi rozvitku informatsiynogo suspilstva», Kyiv.
13. Ukrayinskiy Institut intelektualnoyi vlasnosti (Ukrpatent). 
URL: http://www.uipv.org/ua/bases2.html (Last accessed: 15.05.2018) [in Ukrainian].
14. Caviggioli, F. (2016). Technology fusion: Identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data. Technovation, 55, 22-32.
15. European Research Ranking 2012. 
URL: http//www.researchranking.org (Last accessed: 20.06.2018).
16. Moussa, B., Varsakelis, N. (2017). International patenting: An application of network analysis. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 15(C), 48-55.
17. Kim, J., Lee, S. (2015). Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92(C), 332-345.
18. RAE Manager's Report . 
URL: http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2009/manager/manager.pdf (Last accessed: 03.07.2018).
19. Research Quality Framework: Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia: 
20. QS World University Rankings 2013. 
URL: http//www.topuniversities.com (Last accessed: 28.06.2018).
21. University Ranking by Academic Performance 2013–2014. 
URL: http//tr.urapcenter.org/2013/ (Last accessed: 27.06.2018).
22. Musina, L. A., Kvasha, T. K. (2009). Pidkhody, indykatory ta metody otsiniuvannia vplyvu naukovo-tekhnichnoi diialnosti na ekonomichnyi rozvytok. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
23. Ali, A., Gittelman, M. (2016). Research paradigms and useful inventions in medicine: рatents and licensing by teams of clinical and basic scientists in Academic Medical Centers. Research Policy, 45(8), 1499–1511.